Judgment_paragraph 19 · Bimbo SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-591/12 P)

19As to the merits, according to settled case-law, the risk that the public might believe that the goods or services in question come from the same undertaking or, as the case may be, from economically-linked undertakings, constitutes a likelihood of confusion within the meaning of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 (see Case C‑334/05 P OHIM v Shaker EU:C:2007:333, paragraph 33, and Case C‑193/06 P Nestlé v OHIM EU:C:2007:539, paragraph 32).