Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Groupe Gascogne SA v European Commission (C-58/12 P)
Judgment
The background to the dispute and the…
7

Groupe Gascogne SA v European Commission (C-58/12 P)

Judgment of 26 Nov 2013law://eu/cjeu/2012/c-58-12/para_7@2026-11-10

7The appellant holds 10% of Sachsa’s share capital directly. Its wholly‑owned subsidiary, Gascogne Deutschland GmbH holds the remaining 90%.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-58/12 P · ECLI:EU:C:2013:770
Decided: 26 Nov 2013
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Groupe Gascogne SA
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: M. Berger
Advocate General: E. Sharpston
Bench: 13 judges
V. Skouris, K. Lenaerts, R. Silva de Lapuerta, M. Ilešič, L. Bay Larsen, M. Safjan, J. Malenovský, E. Levits, A. Ó Caoimh, J.‑C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, D. Šváby, M. Berger
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012CJ0058

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

26 Nov 2013Reading

Connections

Cited by 22: Westfälisches Textilwerk Adolf Ahlers Stiftung & Co. KG v European Commission (T-87/25); Lantmännen ek för and Lantmännen Biorefineries AB v European Commission (T-93/24); Asociación Profesional de Empresas de Reparto y Manipulado de Correspondencia (Asempre) v European Commission (C-124/24); Uno Organización Empresarial de Logística y Transporte v European Commission (C-126/24); Intel Corporation Inc. v European Commission (T-1129/23); Smart Kid S.A. v European Commission (T-337/24); Rada Nadzorcza Getin Noble Bank S.A. and Others v Bankowy Fundusz Gwarancyjny (C-118/23); Victaulic Europe v European Commission (T-373/16); ZF CV Systems Europe, anciennement Wabco Europe v European Commission (T-637/16); Tazzetti SpA and Tazzetti, SA v European Commission (T-825/19); Satabank plc v European Central Bank (T-72/20); Christoph Klein v European Commission (C-430/20 P); European Commission v Landesbank Baden-Württemberg and Single Resolution Board (C-584/20 P); Italmobiliare SpA and Others v European Commission (C-694/19); Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v European Commission (T-814/17); Khaled Kaddour v Council of the European Union (T-510/18); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-14/18); Italmobiliare SpA and Others v European Commission (T-523/15); Silver Plastics GmbH & Co. KG and Johannes Reifenhäuser Holding GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission (T-582/15); CCPL - Consorzio Cooperative di Produzione e Lavoro SC and Others v European Commission (T-522/15); Appeal — Actions for damages — Second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU — Excessive duration of the proceedings in two cases before the General Court of the European Union — Damage allegedly suffered by the applicants — Material damage — Bank guarantee charges — Causal link — Default interest — Non-material damage (C-138/17 P, C-146/17 P)4 provisions; Biogaran v European Commission (T-677/14)
Cites 17: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Elf Aquitaine SA v European Commission (C-521/09 P); Schindler Holding Ltd and Others v European Commission (C-501/11 P); Groupe Gascogne SA v European Commission (T-72/06); Lafarge SA v European Commission (C-413/08 P); Alliance One International Inc., formerly Standard Commercial Corp., and Standard Commercial Tobacco Co. Inc. v European Commission and European Commission v Alliance One International Inc. and Others (C-628/10 P, C-14/11 P); Seventh Council Directive 83/349/EEC of 13 June 1983 based on the Article 54 (3) (g) of the Treaty on consolidated accounts; SGL Carbon AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-328/05 P); 2007/686/EC: Commission Decision of 30 November 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the Treaty establishing the European Community against Armando Álvarez SA, Bernay Film Plastique, Bischof + Klein France SAS, Bischof + Klein GmbH & Co. KG, Bonar Technical Fabrics NV, British Polythene Industries PLC, Cofira-Sac SA, Combipac BV, Fardem Packaging BV, FLSmidth & Co. A/S, FLS Plast A/S, Groupe Gascogne, JM Gesellschaft für industrielle Beteiligungen mbH & Co. KGaA, Kendrion NV, Koninklijke Verpakkingsindustrie Stempher CV, Low & Bonar PLC, Nordenia International AG, Nordfolien GmbH, Plásticos Españoles SA, RKW AG Rheinische Kunststoffwerke, Sachsa Verpackung GmbH, Stempher BV, Trioplast Industrier AB, Trioplast Wittenheim SA, UPM-Kymmene Oyj (Case COMP/38354 — Industrial bags) (notified under document number C(2005) 4634); Legris Industries SA v European Commission (C-289/11); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); Der Grüne Punkt - Duales System Deutschland GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-385/07); Baustahlgewebe GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-185/95); Laboratoires pharmaceutiques Bergaderm SA and Jean-Jacques Goupil v Commission of the European Communities (C-352/98)