Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Kone AG and Others v ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG (C-557/12)
Judgment
The question referred for a preliminar…
26

Kone AG and Others v ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG (C-557/12)

Judgment of 5 Jun 2014law://eu/cjeu/2012/c-557-12/para_26@2026-11-10

26In that regard, and specifically in the context of competition law, those rules must not jeopardise the effective application of Articles 101 TFEU and 102 TFEU (see Case C‑439/08 VEBIC EU:C:2010:739, paragraph 57; Pfleiderer EU:C:2011:389, paragraph 24; and Donau Chemie and Others EU:C:2013:366, paragraph 27).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Case: C-557/12 · ECLI:EU:C:2014:1317
Decided: 5 Jun 2014
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria)
Applicants: Kone AG; Otis GmbH and 3 more
Schindler Aufzüge und Fahrtreppen GmbH; Schindler Liegenschaftsverwaltung GmbH; ThyssenKrupp Aufzüge GmbH
Defendant: ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG
Rapporteur: A. Rosas
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 5 judges
T. von Danwitz, E. Juhász, A. Rosas, D. Šváby, C. Vajda
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012CJ0557

Topics

History · 1 version

5 Jun 2014Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions
Cited by 15: CP v Nissan Iberia SA (C-21/24); X and Y v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-180/17); Vantaan kaupunki v Skanska Industrial Solutions Oy and Others (C-724/17); AB Volvo and DAF Trucks NV v RM (C-267/20); Otis Gesellschaft m.b.H. and Others v Land Oberösterreich and Others (C-435/18)2 provisions; Japan Airlines Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-340/17)4 provisions; SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission (T-324/17)4 provisions; International Skating Union v European Commission (T-93/18); Cogeco Communications Inc v Sport TV Portugal SA and Others (C-637/17)2 provisions; X v Belastingdienst/Toeslagen (C-175/17); DHL Express (Italy) Srl and DHL Global Forwarding (Italy) SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del mercato (C-428/14)2 provisions; Martinair Holland NV v European Commission (T-67/11)2 provisions; Cargolux Airlines International SA v European Commission (T-39/11); Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v European Commission (T-28/11); SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission (T-56/11)
Cites 8: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Vincenzo Manfredi v Lloyd Adriatico Assicurazioni SpA, Antonio Cannito v Fondiaria Sai SpA and Nicolò Tricarico and Pasqualina Murgolo v Assitalia SpA (C-295/04, C-296/04, C-297/04, C-298/04); Vlaamse federatie van verenigingen van Brood- en Banketbakkers, Ijsbereiders en Chocoladebewerkers (VEBIC) VZW (C-439/08); Belgische Radio en Televisie and société belge des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs v SV SABAM and NV Fonior (C-127/73); Pfleiderer AG v Bundeskartellamt (C-360/09); Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v Donau Chemie AG and Others (C-536/11); Courage Ltd v Bernard Crehan and Bernard Crehan v Courage Ltd and Others (C-453/99); Europese Gemeenschap v Otis NV and Others (C-199/11)