Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Marc Brogsitter v Fabrication de Montres Normandes EURL and Karsten Fräßdorf (C-548/12)
Judgment
The question referred for a preliminar…
24

Marc Brogsitter v Fabrication de Montres Normandes EURL and Karsten Fräßdorf (C-548/12)

Judgment of 13 Mar 2014law://eu/cjeu/2012/c-548-12/para_24@2026-11-10

24That is the case only where the conduct complained of may be considered a breach of contract, which may be established by taking into account the purpose of the contract.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Seventh Chamber
Case: C-548/12 · ECLI:EU:C:2014:148
Decided: 13 Mar 2014
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Landgericht Krefeld (Germany)
Applicant: Marc Brogsitter
Defendants: Fabrication de Montres Normandes EURL; Karsten Fräßdorf
Rapporteur: J.-C. Bonichot
Advocate General: N. Jääskinen
Bench: 3 judges
J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012CJ0548

Topics

Judicial cooperation in civil matters

History · 1 version

13 Mar 2014Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters
Cited by 8: Harald Kolassa v Barclays Bank plc (C-375/13); Granarolo SpA v Ambrosi Emmi France SA (C-196/15); Helga Löber v Barclays Bank PLC (C-304/17); Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Amazon EU Sàrl (C-191/15); Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte Gesellschaft mbH v Amazon EU Sàrl and Others (C-572/14); Wikingerhof GmbH & Co. KG v Booking.com BV (C-59/19); flyLAL-Lithuanian Airlines AS v Starptautiskā lidosta Rīga VAS and Air Baltic Corporation AS (C-302/13); Holterman Ferho Exploitatie BV and Others v F.L.F. Spies von Büllesheim (C-47/14)3 provisions
Cites 6: Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters; ÖFAB, Östergötlands Fastigheter AB v Frank Koot and Evergreen Investments BV (C-147/12); Falco Privatstiftung and Thomas Rabitsch v Gisela Weller-Lindhorst (C-533/07); Corman-Collins SA v La Maison du Whisky SA (C-9/12); Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Karl Heinz Henkel (C-167/00); Athanasios Kalfelis v Bankhaus Schröder, Münchmeyer, Hengst and Co. and others (C-189/87)