Judgment_paragraph 36 · Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) v National Lottery Commission (C-530/12 P)

36In relation to the role of the General Court, the Court, referring to Article 63(2) of Regulation No 40/94, which defines the cases in which an action may be brought against decisions of the Boards of Appeal of OHIM, stated that it has jurisdiction to conduct a full review of the legality of OHIM’s assessment of the particulars submitted by an applicant in order to establish the content of the national law whose protection he claims (Edwin v OHIM, paragraph 52).

Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) v National Lottery Commission (C-530/12 P)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections