Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Pohotovosť s. r. o. v Miroslav Vašuta (C-470/12)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The second question
60

Pohotovosť s. r. o. v Miroslav Vašuta (C-470/12)

Judgment of 27 Feb 2014law://eu/cjeu/2012/c-470-12/para_60@2026-11-10

60However, it is not the task of the Court of Justice, in preliminary ruling proceedings, to interpret national legislation or regulations (see, inter alia, Case C-151/02 Jaeger [2003] ECR I-8389, paragraph 43, and Case C-237/04 Enirisorse [2006] ECR I-2843, paragraph 24 and the case-law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-470/12 · ECLI:EU:C:2014:101
Decided: 27 Feb 2014
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Okresný súd Svidník (Slovakia)
Applicant: Pohotovosť s. r. o.
Defendant: Miroslav Vašuta
Rapporteur: C. Toader
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 5 judges
M. Ilešič, C. G. Fernlund, A. Ó Caoimh, C. Toader, E. Jarašiūnas
Language: Slovak
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012CJ0470

Topics

Approximation of laws Charter of Fundamental Rights Consumer protection

History · 1 version

27 Feb 2014Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Council Directive 93/13/EEC4 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions
Cited by 21: Tele2 Sverige AB v Post- och telestyrelsen and Secretary of State for the Home Department v Tom Watson and Others (C-203/15)2 provisions; Ryanair DAC v DelayFix (C-519/19); SC Raiffeisen Bank SA and BRD Groupe Societé Générale SA v JB and KC (C-698/18, C-699/18); Finanmadrid EFC SA v VA and Others (C-49/14); Monika Kušionová v SMART Capital, a.s (C-34/13); Ernst Georg Radlinger and Helena Radlingerová v Finway a.s (C-377/14); Miasto Łowicz v Skarb Państwa – Wojewoda Łódzki and Prokurator Generalny v VX and Others (C-558/18, C-563/18); ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt v Attila Sugár (C-32/14); K.D. v Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń Ż S.A (C-208/21); Nóra Baczó and János István Vizsnyiczai v Raiffeisen Bank Zrt (C-567/13); EOS KSI Slovensko s.r.o. v Ján Danko and Margita Danková (C-448/17)2 provisions; Banco Santander SA v Asociación de Consumidores y Usuarios de Servicios Generales-Auge (C-346/23)2 provisions; B. v Centre public d'action sociale de Líège (CPAS) (C-233/19)2 provisions; Ministerio Fiscal v VL (C-36/20 PPU); Bondora AS v Carlos V. C. and XY (C-453/18, C-494/18); M.A. and Others v The International Protection Appeals Tribunal and Others (C-661/17); Milena Tomášová v Slovenská republika - Ministerstvo spravodlivosti SR and Pohotovosť s.r.o (C-168/15); J.B.G.T. Miljoen and Others v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-10/14, C-14/14, C-17/14); Rohm Semiconductor GmbH v Hauptzollamt Krefeld (C-666/13); Gérard Buono and Others v European Commission (C-12/13 P, C-13/13 P); Philippe Gruslin v Beobank SA (C-88/13)
Cites 21: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Council Directive 93/13/EEC; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Asturcom Telecomunicaciones SL v Cristina Rodríguez Nogueira (C-40/08); Nemzeti Fogyasztóvédelmi Hatóság v Invitel Távközlési Zrt (C-472/10); Pannon GSM Zrt. v Erzsébet Sustikné Győrfi (C-243/08); Océano Grupo Editorial SA v Roció Murciano Quintero and Salvat Editores SA v José M. Sánchez Alcón Prades, José Luis Copano Badillo, Mohammed Berroane and Emilio Viñas Feliú (C-240/98, C-241/98, C-242/98, C-243/98, C-244/98); CARTESIO Oktató és Szolgáltató bt (C-210/06); Pasquale Foglia v Mariella Novello (C-244/80); Cofidis SA v Jean-Louis Fredout (C-473/00); Elisa María Mostaza Claro v Centro Móvil Milenium SL (C-168/05); Asociación de Consumidores Independientes de Castilla y León v Anuntis Segundamano España SL (C-413/12); Carmela Carratù v Poste Italiane SpA (C-361/12); Ourdia Djabali v Caisse d'allocations familiales de l'Essonne (C-314/96); Wienand Meilicke v ADV/ORGA F. A. Meyer AG (C-83/91); Danske Slagterier v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-445/06); Pohotovosť s.r.o. v Iveta Korčkovská (C-76/10); Enirisorse SpA v Sotacarbo SpA (C-237/04); Rosa García Blanco v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS) (C-225/02); Landeshauptstadt Kiel v Norbert Jaeger (C-151/02); Virginie Pontin v T-Comalux SA (C-63/08)