Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Nils Svensson and Others v Retriever Sverige AB (C-466/12)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The first three questions
15

Nils Svensson and Others v Retriever Sverige AB (C-466/12)

Judgment of 13 Feb 2014law://eu/cjeu/2012/c-466-12/para_15@2026-11-10

15In this connection, it follows from Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29 that every act of communication of a work to the public has to be authorised by the copyright holder.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-466/12 · ECLI:EU:C:2014:76
Decided: 13 Feb 2014
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Svea hovrätt (Sweden)
Applicants: Nils Svensson; Sten Sjögren; Madelaine Sahlman; Pia Gadd
Defendant: Retriever Sverige AB
Rapporteur: J. Malenovský
Advocate General: E. Sharpston
Bench: 5 judges
L. Bay Larsen, M. Safjan, J. Malenovský, A. Prechal, S. Rodin
Language: Swedish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012CJ0466

Topics

Approximation of laws Copyright and related rights Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

13 Feb 2014Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2001/29/EC2 provisions
Cited by 14: Nederlands Uitgeversverbond and Groep Algemene Uitgevers v Tom Kabinet Internet BV and Others (C-263/18); Blue Air Aviation SA v UCMR – ADA Asociaţia pentru Drepturi de Autor a Compozitorilor and Uniunea Producătorilor de Fonograme din România (UPFR) v Societatea Naţională de Transport Feroviar de Călători (SNTFC) 'CFR Călători' SA (C-775/21); Funke Medien NRW GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-469/17); Pelham GmbH and Others v Ralf Hütter and Florian Schneider-Esleben (C-476/17); Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck (C-516/17); GS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV and Others (C-160/15)6 provisions; Stichting Brein v Ziggo BV and XS4All Internet BV (C-610/15); Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Dirk Renckhoff (C-161/17)2 provisions; Stichting Brein v Jack Frederik Wullems (C-527/15); VG Bild-Kunst v Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz (C-392/19)2 provisions; Marc Soulier and Sara Doke v Premier ministre and Ministre de la Culture et de la Communication (C-301/15)2 provisions; SBS Belgium NV v Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers (SABAM) (C-325/14); C More Entertainment AB v Linus Sandberg (C-279/13)2 provisions; Technische Universität Darmstadt v Eugen Ulmer KG (C-117/13)
Cites 7: Directive 2001/29/EC2 provisions; Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España (SGAE) v Rafael Hoteles SA (C-306/05); 2000/278/EC: Council Decision of 16 March 2000 on the approval, on behalf of the European Community, of the WIPO Copyright Treaty and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty; Football Association Premier League Ltd and Others v QC Leisure and Others and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (C-403/08, C-429/08); ITV Broadcasting Ltd and Others v TVCatchUp Ltd (C-607/11); Martin Luksan v Petrus van der Let (C-277/10); Organismos Sillogikis Diacheirisis Dimiourgon Theatrikon kai Optikoakoustikon Ergon v Divani Akropolis Anonimi Xenodocheiaki kai Touristiki Etaireai (C-136/09)