Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Slancheva sila EOOD v Izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond 'Zemedelie' Razplashtatelna agentsia (C-434/12)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The first and fourth to seventh questi…
27

Slancheva sila EOOD v Izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond 'Zemedelie' Razplashtatelna agentsia (C-434/12)

Judgment of 12 Sept 2013law://eu/cjeu/2012/c-434-12/para_27@2026-11-10

27It is settled case-law that the scope of European Union regulations must not be extended to cover abuses on the part of a trader (see, to that effect, Case C-279/05 Vonk Dairy Products [2007] ECR I-239, paragraph 31).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Sixth Chamber
Case: C-434/12 · ECLI:EU:C:2013:546
Decided: 12 Sept 2013
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Bulgaria)
Applicant: Slancheva sila EOOD
Defendant: Izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond Zemedelie Razplashtatelna agentsia
Rapporteur: E. Levits
Advocate General: P. Cruz Villalón
Bench: 3 judges
M. Berger, E. Levits, J.‑J. Kasel
Language: Bulgarian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012CJ0434

Topics

History · 1 version

12 Sept 2013Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Commission Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 of 27 January 2011 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, as regards the implementation of control procedures as well as cross-compliance in respect of rural development support measures
Cited by 5: SC Avio Lucos SRL v Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură – Centrul judeţean Dolj and Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură (APIA) – Aparat Central (C-176/20)2 provisions; Republic of Lithuania v European Commission (C-153/20); Republic of Lithuania v European Commission (T-19/18); Republic of Poland v European Commission (T-21/18); Republic of Poland v European Commission (T-51/17)
Cites 6: Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD); Emsland-Stärke GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas (C-110/99); Eichsfelder Schlachtbetrieb GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas (C-515/03); Commission Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 of 27 January 2011 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, as regards the implementation of control procedures as well as cross-compliance in respect of rural development support measures; Vonk Dairy Products BV v Productschap Zuivel (C-279/05); Halifax plc, Leeds Permanent Development Services Ltd and County Wide Property Investments Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise (C-255/02)