Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Kingdom of Denmark v European Commission (C-417/12 P)
Judgment
Appeal
Consideration of the third ground of a…
Findings of the Court
83

Kingdom of Denmark v European Commission (C-417/12 P)

Judgment of 15 Oct 2014law://eu/cjeu/2012/c-417-12/para_83@2026-11-10

83Consequently, it is for the Member State to adduce the most detailed and comprehensive evidence that its checks have been carried out and its figures are accurate and, if appropriate, that the Commission’s assertions are incorrect (judgment in Greece v Commission, EU:C:2005:103, paragraph 36).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-417/12 P · ECLI:EU:C:2014:2288
Decided: 15 Oct 2014
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Kingdom of Denmark
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: E. Levits
Advocate General: N. Jääskinen
Bench: 5 judges
A. Tizzano, S. Rodin, A. Borg Barthet, E. Levits, M. Berger
Language: Danish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012CJ0417

Topics

Agricultural funds

History · 1 version

15 Oct 2014Reading

Connections

Cited by 9: Kingdom of Sweden v European Commission (T-485/22); Republic of Lithuania v European Commission (T-564/23); Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-495/21); European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (C-406/19); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-295/18); Republic of Poland v European Commission (C-358/18); Republic of Lithuania v European Commission (T-603/17); Kingdom of Sweden v European Commission (T-260/16); Italian Republic v European Commission (C-280/14 P)2 provisions
Cites 11: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Commission Regulation (EC) No 2316/1999 of 22 October 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1251/1999 establishing a support system for producers of certain arable crops; Kingdom of Denmark v European Commission (T-212/09); Edwin Co. Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-263/09 P); Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities (C-54/95); Hellenic Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-300/02); Commission Regulation (EC) No 2419/2001 of 11 December 2001 laying down detailed rules for applying the integrated administration and control system for certain Community aid schemes established by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92; Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities (C-418/06); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-253/97); French Republic v European Commission (C-601/11 P); 2009/253/EC: Commission Decision of 19 March 2009 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) (notified under document number C(2009) 1945)