Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Gascogne Sack Deutschland GmbH v European Commission (C-40/12 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The second ground
The second part of the second ground
–Findings of the Court
51

Gascogne Sack Deutschland GmbH v European Commission (C-40/12 P)

Judgment of 26 Nov 2013law://eu/cjeu/2012/c-40-12/para_51@2026-11-10

51The second part of the ground therefore introduces a new plea in law, which consists in disputing the adequacy of the statement of reasons in the contested decision regarding the method of calculation used by the Commission in order to determine the upper limit of 10%.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-40/12 P · ECLI:EU:C:2013:768
Decided: 26 Nov 2013
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Gascogne Sack Deutschland GmbH
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: M. Berger
Advocate General: E. Sharpston
Bench: 13 judges
V. Skouris, K. Lenaerts, R. Silva de Lapuerta, M. Ilešič, L. Bay Larsen, M. Safjan, J. Malenovský, E. Levits, A. Ó Caoimh, J.‑C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, D. Šváby, M. Berger
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012CJ0040

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

26 Nov 2013Reading

Connections

Cited by 13: Napfény-Toll Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (C-615/21); 'Vivacom Bulgaria' EAD v Varhoven administrativen sad and Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite (C-369/23); European Commission v Landesbank Baden-Württemberg and Single Resolution Board (C-584/20 P); Brugg Kabel AG and Kabelwerke Brugg AG Holding v European Commission (C-591/18); All Star CV v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-611/17); Appeal — Actions for damages — Second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU — Excessive duration of the proceedings in two cases before the General Court of the European Union — Damage allegedly suffered by the applicants — Material damage — Bank guarantee charges — Causal link — Default interest — Non-material damage (C-138/17 P, C-146/17 P)4 provisions; Feralpi Holding SpA v European Commission (C-85/15 P)2 provisions; Ferriera Valsabbia SpA and Others v European Commission (C-86/15 P, C-87/15 P)2 provisions; Aloys F. Dornbracht GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission (C-604/13 P); Timab Industries and Cie financière et de participations Roullier (CFPR) v European Commission (C-411/15 P)2 provisions; Gascogne Sack Deutschland GmbH and Gascogne v European Union (T-577/14)7 provisions; Trafilerie Meridionali SpA v European Commission (C-519/15 P); Ori Martin SA and Siderurgica Latina Martin SpA (SLM) v European Commission (C-490/15)
Cites 13: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Elf Aquitaine SA v European Commission (C-521/09 P); Schindler Holding Ltd and Others v European Commission (C-501/11 P); Der Grüne Punkt - Duales System Deutschland GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-385/07); Baustahlgewebe GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-185/95); Laboratoires pharmaceutiques Bergaderm SA and Jean-Jacques Goupil v Commission of the European Communities (C-352/98 P); Alliance One International Inc., formerly Standard Commercial Corp., and Standard Commercial Tobacco Co. Inc. v European Commission and European Commission v Alliance One International Inc. and Others (C-628/10 P, C-14/11 P); Sachsa Verpackung GmbH v European Commission (T-79/06); SGL Carbon AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-328/05 P); Legris Industries SA v European Commission (C-289/11)