Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Ministeriet for Forskning, Innovation og Videregående Uddannelser v Manova A/S (C-336/12)
Judgment
Consideration of the question referred
36

Ministeriet for Forskning, Innovation og Videregående Uddannelser v Manova A/S (C-336/12)

Judgment of 10 Oct 2013law://eu/cjeu/2012/c-336-12/para_36@2026-11-10

36In addition, that request may not lead to the submission, by a tenderer, of what would appear in reality to be a new tender (see, to that effect, SAG ELV Slovensko and Others, paragraph 40).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Tenth Chamber
Case: C-336/12 · ECLI:EU:C:2013:647
Decided: 10 Oct 2013
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Østre Landsret (Denmark)
Applicant: Ministeriet for Forskning, Innovation og Videregående Uddannelser
Defendant: Manova A/S
Rapporteur: D. Šváby
Advocate General: Y. Bot
Bench: 3 judges
E. Juhász, A. Rosas, D. Šváby
Language: Danish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012CJ0336

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

10 Oct 2013Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts
Cited by 16: MA.T.I. SUD SpA v Centostazioni SpA and Duemme SGR SpA v Associazione Cassa Nazionale di Previdenza e Assistenza in favore dei Ragionieri e Periti Commerciali (CNPR) (C-523/16, C-536/16); Instituto Cervantes and Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (C-534/23); Instituto Cervantes v European Commission (T-376/21)2 provisions; Liam Jenkinson v Council of the European Union and Others (T-602/15 R); 'Klaipėdos regiono atliekų tvarkymo centras' v UAB (C-927/19)2 provisions; Jema Energy, SA v European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (T-668/15); Archus sp. z o.o. and Gama Jacek Lipik v Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A (C-131/16)2 provisions; Esaprojekt sp. z o.o. v Województwo Łódzkie (C-387/14)2 provisions; Connexxion Taxi Services BV v Staat der Nederlanden (Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport) and Others (C-171/15); Ciclat Soc. Coop. v Consip SpA and Autorità per la Vigilanza sui Contratti Pubblici di lavori, servizi e forniture (C-199/15); Pippo Pizzo v CRGT Srl (C-27/15); Partner Apelski Dariusz v Zarząd Oczyszczania Miasta (C-324/14)2 provisions; Cartiera dell’Adda SpA v CEM Ambiente SpA (C-42/13); Euro-Link Consultants Srl and European Profiles AE Meleton kai Symvoulon Epicheiriseon v European Commission (T-199/12); Ministero dell’Interno v Fastweb SpA (C-19/13); Impresa Pizzarotti & C. SpA v Comune di Bari and Others (C-213/13)
Cites 6: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts; SAG ELV Slovensko a.s. and Others v Úrad pre verejné obstarávanie (C-599/10); Fabricom SA v Belgian State (C-21/03, C-34/03); European Commission v Ireland (C-226/09); Commission of the European Communities v CAS Succhi di Frutta SpA (C-496/99 P)