Judgment_paragraph 34 · Trento Sviluppo srl and Centrale Adriatica Soc. coop. arl v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (C-281/12)

34That interpretation is also borne out by the case-law of the Court. According to paragraph 47 of the judgment in Case C‑453/10 Pereničová and Perenič [2012] ECR and paragraph 42 of the judgment in CHS Tour Services, a commercial practice is considered to be misleading for the purposes of Article 6(1) of Directive 2005/29 to the extent that the information is misleading and is likely to cause the consumer to take a transactional decision that he would not have taken in the absence of such a practice.