Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands and ING Groep NV (C-224/12 P)
Judgment
Appeal
First ground of appeal, alleging that…
Findings of the Court
29

European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands and ING Groep NV (C-224/12 P)

Judgment of 3 Apr 2014law://eu/cjeu/2012/c-224-12/para_29@2026-11-10

29As a preliminary point, it must be pointed out that the debate before the General Court did not concern the specific application of the private investor test to the amendment to the repayment terms of the capital injection, but whether that test is applicable.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-224/12 P · ECLI:EU:C:2014:213
Decided: 3 Apr 2014
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: European Commission
Defendants: Kingdom of the Netherlands; ING Groep NV
Rapporteur: J.L. da Cruz Vilaça
Advocate General: E. Sharpston
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, G. Arestis, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012CJ0224

Topics

History · 1 version

3 Apr 2014Reading

Connections

Cited by 14: Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-238/21); European Commission v Anthony Braesch and Others (C-284/21 P); Volotea, SA and easyJet Airline Company Ltd. v European Commission (C-331/20 P); NRW. Bank v Single Resolution Board (SRB) (C-662/19 P); Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A. v European Commission (T-778/17); International Management Group v European Commission (C-183/17 P, C-184/17 P); Freistaat Bayern v European Commission (T-683/15); Interessengemeinschaft privater Milchverarbeiter Bayerns e.V. and Others v European Commission (T-722/15); SNCF Mobilités, formerly Société nationale des chemins de fer français (SNCF) v European Commission (C-127/16 P)2 provisions; European Commission v FIH Holding A/S and FIH Erhvervsbank A/S (C-579/16 P)8 provisions; Servizi assicurativi del commercio estero SpA (SACE) and Sace BT SpA v European Commission (C-472/15); Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) v European Commission (C-228/16 P); FIH Holding A/S and FIH Erhvervsbank A/S v European Commission (T-386/14)3 provisions; Frucona Košice a.s. v European Commission (T-103/14)2 provisions
Cites 11: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; French Republic v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-244/03); European Commission v Verhuizingen Coppens NV (C-441/11 P); Giuseppe Grasselli v European Commission (C-23/80); Kingdom of the Netherlands and ING Groep NV v European Commission (T-29/10, T-33/10); 2010/608/EC: Commission Decision of 18 November 2009 on State aid C 10/09 (ex N 138/09) implemented by the Netherlands for ING’s Illiquid Assets Back Facility and Restructuring Plan (notified under document C(2009) 9000) Text with EEA relevance; European Commission v Maria Dolores Fernández Gómez (C-417/05 P); European Commission v Électricité de France (EDF) (C-124/10 P); European Commission v Ireland and Others (C-272/12 P); P & O European Ferries (Vizcaya) SA and Diputación Foral de Vizcaya v Commission of the European Communities (C-442/03 P, C-471/03 P); Commission of the European Communities v Greencore Group plc (C-123/03 P)