Judgment_paragraph 81 · Land Burgenland (C‑214/12 P), Grazer Wechselseitige Versicherung AG (C‑215/12 P) and Republic of Austria (C‑223/12 P) v European Commission (C-214/12 P, C-215/12 P, C-223/12 P)

81In the fourth place, as regards the claim by the Province of Burgenland and the Republic of Austria that the General Court breached the obligation to state reasons, it is apparent from the foregoing and from simply reading paragraph 132 of the Burgenland judgment that the General Court’s reasoning in paragraphs 120, 121 and 132 of that judgment is such as to allow the applicants to know the reasons for which the General Court rejected their arguments and to provide the Court of Justice with sufficient material for it to exercise its power of judicial review in an appeal, so that it is in conformity with the established case-law of the Court on that matter (see, to that effect, inter alia, Case C‑320/09 P A2A v Commission [2011] ECR, paragraph 97).