Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
United Antwerp Maritime Agencies (Unamar) NV v Navigation Maritime Bulgare (C-184/12)
Judgment
The question referred for a preliminar…
39

United Antwerp Maritime Agencies (Unamar) NV v Navigation Maritime Bulgare (C-184/12)

Judgment of 17 Oct 2013law://eu/cjeu/2012/c-184-12/para_39@2026-11-10

39In that regard, Articles 17 and 18 of the directive are of crucial importance, as they define the level of protection which the European Union legislature considered reasonable to grant commercial agents in the course of the creation of the single market.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-184/12 · ECLI:EU:C:2013:663
Decided: 17 Oct 2013
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicant: United Antwerp Maritime Agencies (Unamar) NV
Defendant: Navigation Maritime Bulgare
Rapporteur: C. Toader
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 5 judges
M. Ilešič, C.G. Fernlund, A. Ó Caoimh, C. Toader, E. Jarašiūnas
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012CJ0184

Topics

Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services Rome Convention of 19 June 1980

History · 1 version

17 Oct 2013Reading

Connections

Cited by 11: Republik Griechenland v Grigorios Nikiforidis (C-135/15); Agostinho da Silva Martins v Dekra Claims Services Portugal SA (C-149/18); Conseils et mise en relations (CMR) SARL v Demeures terre et tradition SARL (C-645/16)2 provisions; Marchon Germany GmbH v Yvonne Karaszkiewicz (C-315/14)2 provisions; Quenon K. SPRL v Beobank SA and Metlife Insurance SA (C-338/14)2 provisions; Agro Foreign Trade & Agency Ltd v Petersime NV (C-507/15)2 provisions; Cartier parfums — lunettes SAS and Axa Corporate Solutions assurances SA v Ziegler France SA and Others (C-1/13)2 provisions; JF and NS v Diamond Resorts Europe Limited (Branch in Spain) and Others (C-632/21); AY v Liechtensteinische Landesbank (Österreich) AG (C-279/24); E.N.I. and Y.K.I. v HUK-COBURG-Allgemeine Versicherung AG (C-86/23); DG and EH v SC Gruber Logistics SRL and Sindicatul Lucrătorilor din Transporturi v SC Samidani Trans SRL (C-152/20)
Cites 12: Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I); Council Directive 86/653/EEC; Honyvem Informazioni Commerciali Srl v Mariella De Zotti (C-465/04); Turgay Semen v Deutsche Tamoil GmbH (C-348/07); Ingmar GB Ltd v Eaton Leonard Technologies Inc (C-381/98); Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxemburg (C-319/06); Volvo Car Germany GmbH v Autohof Weidensdorf GmbH (C-203/09); Criminal proceedings against Jean-Claude Arblade and Arblade & Fils SARL and Bernard Leloup, Serge Leloup and Sofrage SARL (C-369/96, C-376/96); Barbara Bellone v Yokohama SpA (C-215/97); Poseidon Chartering BV v Marianne Zeeschip VOF and Others (C-3/04); SIA Garkalns v Rīgas dome (C-470/11); A. Leur-Bloem v Inspecteur der Belastingdienst/Ondernemingen Amsterdam 2 (C-28/95)