Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Peter Pinckney v KDG Mediatech AG (C-170/12)
Judgment
The questions referred for a prelimina…
Substance
45

Peter Pinckney v KDG Mediatech AG (C-170/12)

Judgment of 3 Oct 2013law://eu/cjeu/2012/c-170-12/para_45@2026-11-10

45However, if the protection granted by the Member State of the place of the court seised is applicable only in that Member State, the court seised only has jurisdiction to determine the damage caused within the Member State in which it is situated.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-170/12 · ECLI:EU:C:2013:635
Decided: 3 Oct 2013
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Cour de cassation (France)
Applicant: Peter Pinckney
Defendant: KDG Mediatech AG
Rapporteur: M. Safjan
Advocate General: N. Jääskinen
Bench: 5 judges
L. Bay Larsen, J. Malenovský, U. Lõhmus, M. Safjan, A. Prechal
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012CJ0170

Topics

Judicial cooperation in civil matters

History · 1 version

3 Oct 2013Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters
Cited by 10: Bolagsupplysningen OÜ and Ingrid Ilsjan v Svensk Handel AB (C-194/16); Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte Gesellschaft mbH v Amazon EU Sàrl and Others (C-572/14); Pez Hejduk v EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH (C-441/13); Andreas Kainz v Pantherwerke AG (C-45/13)2 provisions; SS v MCP (C-603/20 PPU); Gtflix Tv v DR (C-251/20); NM and OU v TE (C-77/24); Concurrence Sàrl v Samsung Electronics France SAS and Amazon Services Europe Sàrl (C-618/15)2 provisions; Coty Germany GmbH v First Note Perfumes NV (C-360/12)2 provisions; Hi Hotel HCF SARL v Uwe Spoering (C-387/12)2 provisions
Cites 10: Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters; Directive 2001/29/EC; eDate Advertising GmbH and Others v X and Société MGN LIMITED (C-509/09, C-161/10); Melzer v MF Global UK Ltd (C-228/11); Wintersteiger AG v Products 4U Sondermaschinenbau GmbH (C-523/10); Folien Fischer AG and Fofitec AG v Ritrama SpA (C-133/11); Peter Pammer v Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co. KG and Hotel Alpenhof GesmbH v Oliver Heller (C-585/08); Hans Eckelkamp and Others v Belgische Staat (C-11/07); Veli Elshani v Hauptzollamt Linz (C-459/07); Teritorialna direktsia na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite — Plovdiv v Rodopi-M 91 OOD (C-259/12)