Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Pensionsversicherungsanstalt v Peter Brey (C-140/12)
Judgment
The question referred for a preliminar…
The right of a Union citizen who is no…
The need to meet the necessary require…
41

Pensionsversicherungsanstalt v Peter Brey (C-140/12)

Judgment of 19 Sept 2013law://eu/cjeu/2012/c-140-12/para_41@2026-11-10

41On the other hand, that provision is not intended to lay down the conditions creating the right to special non-contributory cash benefits. It is for the legislation of each Member State to lay down those conditions (see, to that effect, Dumont de Chassart, paragraph 39 and the case‑law cited).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-140/12 · ECLI:EU:C:2013:565
Decided: 19 Sept 2013
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria)
Applicant: Pensionsversicherungsanstalt
Defendant: Peter Brey
Rapporteur: A. Ó Caoimh
Advocate General: N. Wahl
Bench: 5 judges
M. Ilešič, E. Jarašiūnas, A. Ó Caoimh, C. Toader, C.G. Fernlund
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012CJ0140

Topics

Right of entry and residence

History · 1 version

19 Sept 2013Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (Text with EEA relevance)
Cited by 14: Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank v D. Balandin and Others (C-477/17); Neculai Tarola v Minister for Social Protection (C-483/17); Regulation (EU) 2026/2359; S v Familienkasse Niedersachsen-Bremen der Bundesagentur für Arbeit (C-411/20); A v Latvijas Republikas Veselības ministrija (C-535/19); Ermira Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-93/18); J. Klein Schiphorst v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (C-551/16); European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (C-308/14)12 provisions; Vestische Arbeit Jobcenter Kreis Recklinghausen v Jovanna García-Nieto and Others (C-299/14); Jobcenter Berlin Neukölln v Nazifa Alimanovic and Others (C-67/14); Hotel Sava Rogaška, Gostinstvo, turizem in storitve, d.o.o. v Republika Slovenija (C-207/14); Elisabeta Dano and Florin Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig (C-333/13); Ronny Verest and Gaby Gerards v Belgische Staat (C-489/13); Jessy Saint Prix v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (C-507/12)
Cites 23: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community; Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (Text with EEA relevance); The Queen, on the application of Dany Bidar v London Borough of Ealing and Secretary of State for Education and Skills (C-209/03); Rudy Grzelczyk v Centre public d'aide sociale d'Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve (C-184/99); María Martínez Sala v Freistaat Bayern (C-85/96); Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (Text with relevance for the EEA and for Switzerland); Günter Fuß v Stadt Halle (C-243/09); Campina GmbH & Co. v Hauptzollamt Frankfurt (Oder) (C-45/06); Servet Kamberaj v Istituto per l’Edilizia Sociale della Provincia autonoma di Bolzano (IPES) and Others (C-571/10); Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Taous Lassal (C-162/09); Kunqian Catherine Zhu and Man Lavette Chen v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-200/02); Baumbast and R v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-413/99); Flachglas Torgau GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-204/09); Athanasios Vatsouras and Josif Koupatantze v Arbeitsgemeinschaft (ARGE) Nürnberg 900 (C-22/08); Minister voor Vreemdelingenzaken en Integratie v R. N. G. Eind (C-291/05); Anne Kuusijärvi v Riksförsäkringsverket (C-275/96); The Queen, on the application of David Edwards and Lilian Pallikaropoulos v Environment Agency and Others (C-260/11); Patricia Dumont de Chassart v Office national d’allocations familiales pour travailleurs salariés (ONAFTS) (C-619/11); Tomasz Ziolkowski and Barbara Szeja and Others v Land Berlin (C-424/10, C-425/10); Jacqueline Förster v Hoofddirectie van de Informatie Beheer Groep (C-158/07); Milk Marketing Board of England and Wales v Cricket St. Thomas Estate (C-372/88); Shirley McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-434/09)