Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Ordem dos Técnicos Oficiais de Contas v Autoridade da Concorrência (C-1/12)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The first to third questions
The questions referred
39

Ordem dos Técnicos Oficiais de Contas v Autoridade da Concorrência (C-1/12)

Judgment of 28 Feb 2013law://eu/cjeu/2012/c-1-12/para_39@2026-11-10

39Secondly, it is appropriate to examine whether a professional association such as the OTOC must be regarded as an association of undertakings within the meaning of Article 101(1) TFEU when it adopts a regulation such as the contested regulation or, on the contrary, as a public authority.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-1/12 · ECLI:EU:C:2013:127
Decided: 28 Feb 2013
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa (Portugal)
Applicant: Ordem dos Técnicos Oficiais de Contas
Defendant: Autoridade da Concorrência
Rapporteur: A. Arabadjiev
Advocate General: P. Mengozzi
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, G. Arestis, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça
Language: Portuguese
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62012CJ0001

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

28 Feb 2013Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)
Cited by 20: INTERZERO Trajnostne rešitve za svet brez odpadkov d.o.o. and Others and Surovina, družba za predelavo odpadkov d.o.o. and Others (C-254/23); UL and SA Royal Antwerp Football Club v Union royale belge des sociétés de football association ASBL (C-680/21); Lietuvos notarų rūmai and Others v Lietuvos Respublikos konkurencijos taryba (C-128/21); European Superleague Company, SL v Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) and Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) (C-333/21); UBS Group AG and Others v European Commission (T-441/21); Crédit agricole SA and Others v European Commission (T-386/21); European Commission v KRKA, tovarna zdravil, d.d (C-151/19); European Commission v Servier SAS and Others (C-176/19 P); International Skating Union v European Commission (C-124/21 P)6 provisions; Deutsche Lufthansa AG and Others v European Commission (T-342/17); International Skating Union v European Commission (T-93/18); Aanbestedingskalender BV and Others v European Commission (C-687/17); European Road Transport Telematics Implementation Coordination Organisation - Intelligent Transport Systems & Services Europe (Ertico - ITS Europe) v European Commission (T-604/15); Krka Tovarna Zdravil d.d. v European Commission (T-684/14); Servier SAS and Others v European Commission (T-691/14); F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and Others v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (C-179/16); Aanbestedingskalender BV and Others v European Commission (T-138/15); Viasat Broadcasting UK Ltd v European Commission (C-660/15 P); Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-808/14); Abertis Telecom Terrestre, SA and Telecom Castilla-La Mancha, SA v European Commission (T-37/15)
Cites 11: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)5 provisions; Motosykletistiki Omospondia Ellados NPID (MOTOE) v Elliniko Dimosio (C-49/07); Criminal proceedings against Paul Corbeau (C-320/91); J. C. J. Wouters, J. W. Savelbergh and Price Waterhouse Belastingadviseurs BV v Algemene Raad van de Nederlandse Orde van Advocaten, intervener: Raad van de Balies van de Europese Gemeenschap (C-309/99); Federico Cipolla v Rosaria Fazari, née Portolese and Stefano Macrino and Claudia Capoparte v Roberto Meloni (C-94/04, C-202/04); Merci convenzionali porto di Genova SpA v Siderurgica Gabrielli SpA (C-179/90); Asnef-Equifax, Servicios de Información sobre Solvencia y Crédito, SL v Asociación de Usuarios de Servicios Bancarios (Ausbanc) (C-238/05); Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique SAS v Président de l’Autorité de la concurrence and Ministre de l’Économie, de l’Industrie et de l’Emploi (C-439/09); Municipality of Almelo and others v NV Energiebedrijf Ijsselmij (C-393/92); Chemische Afvalstoffen Dusseldorp BV and Others v Minister van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer (C-203/96); Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze v Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA, Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di San Miniato and Cassa di Risparmio di San Miniato SpA (C-222/04)