282Thirdly, the applicants argue that, besides inaccurate information, the notes also contain references to information which, in week 32, was common knowledge. It should be noted, however, that, as the Commission points out, this may simply indicate that, in their anti-competitive contacts, the parties also exchanged information that could have been obtained from other sources. In that respect, it must also be noted that a competitor’s point of view on certain information which was significant for the conditions of supply and demand, which could be obtained other than by means of discussions with the undertakings concerned, and its impact on the development of the market, does not by definition constitute publicly available information (Case T‑588/08 Dole Food and Dole Germany v Commission [2013] ECR, paragraph 279).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.