Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
GFKL Financial Services AG v European Commission (T-620/11)
Judgment
Contested decision
24

GFKL Financial Services AG v European Commission (T-620/11)

Judgment of 4 Feb 2016law://eu/cjeu/2011/t-620-11/para_24@2026-11-11

24On 26 January 2011, the Commission adopted Decision 2011/527/EU on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26; ‘the contested decision’).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Ninth Chamber
Case: T-620/11 · ECLI:EU:T:2016:59
Decided: 4 Feb 2016
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: GFKL Financial Services AG
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: A. Popescu
Bench: 3 judges
G. Berardis, O. Czúcz, A. Popescu
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011TJ0620

Topics

History · 1 version

4 Feb 2016Reading

Connections

Cited by 4: Bruno Gollnisch v European Parliament (C-122/20); Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-209/16); Lowell Financial Services GmbH v European Commission (C-219/16); Centro Clinico e Diagnostico G. B. Morgagni Srl v European Commission (T-172/16)
Cites 22: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Telefónica SA v European Commission (C-274/12 P); Stichting Woonpunt and Others v European Commission (C-132/12 P); Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities (C-156/98); Stichting Woonlinie and Others v European Commission (C-133/12 P); Portuguese Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-88/03); Kingdom of Belgium and Forum 187 ASBL v Commission of the European Communities (C-182/03, C-217/03); British Aggregates Association v Commission of the European Communities and United Kingdom (C-487/06); Comitato «Venezia vuole vivere», Hotel Cipriani Srl and Società Italiana per il gas SpA (Italgas) v European Commission (C-71/09 P, C-73/09 P, C-76/09 P); Kahla Thüringen Porzellan GmbH v European Commission (C-537/08); European Commission and Kingdom of Spain v Government of Gibraltar and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (C-106/09 P, C-107/09 P); Autogrill España, SA v European Commission (T-219/10); Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale and Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Commission of the European Communities (T-228/99, T-233/99); Adria-Wien Pipeline GmbH and Wietersdorfer & Peggauer Zementwerke GmbH v Finanzlandesdirektion für Kärnten (C-143/99); Commission of the European Communities v Chambre syndicale nationale des entreprises de transport de fonds et valeurs (Sytraval) and Brink's France SARL (C-367/95 P); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-310/99); Vadzim Ipatau v Council of the European Union (C-535/14 P); Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty; Plaumann & Co. v Commission of the European Economic Community (25/62); Falck SpA and Acciaierie di Bolzano SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-74/00 P, C-75/00 P); P Oy (C-6/12); European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands (C-279/08 P)