Judgment_paragraph 83 · Koinonia Tis Pliroforias Anoichti Stis Eidikes Anagkes — Isotis v European Commission (T-59/11)

83It should be pointed out in this regard that, in accordance with the principles mentioned in paragraphs 73 to 77 above, it follows from, first, Article II.19 of the FP6 conditions, Article II.16 of the eTEN conditions and Article II.20 of the CIP conditions and, second, Article 1315 of the Belgian Civil Code, which is applicable in this case, that the costs claimed by the applicant may be reimbursed to it only if it has proved that they had actually been incurred, they were related to the contracts at issue and other eligibility criteria laid down by those contracts had been respected (see, to this effect, Case T-68/99 Toditec v Commission [2001] ECR II-1443, paragraphs 94 and 95). If such proof is given, the Commission must demonstrate that it should be disregarded.