Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Castelnou Energía, SL v European Commission (T-57/11)
Law
2. Substance
The third plea in law, alleging infrin…
The proportionality of the contested m…
147

Castelnou Energía, SL v European Commission (T-57/11)

Judgment of 3 Dec 2014law://eu/cjeu/2011/t-57-11/para_147@2026-11-12

147It should be recalled, at the outset, that the review of the proportionality constitutes one of the reviews which the Commission is required to carry out in the context of its assessment of the compatibility of State aid measures with Article 106(2) TFEU.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Second Chamber
Case: T-57/11 · ECLI:EU:T:2014:1021
Decided: 3 Dec 2014
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Castelnou Energía, SL
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: S. Gervasoni
Bench: 3 judges
M.E. Martins Ribeiro, S. Gervasoni, L. Madise
Language: Spanish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011TJ0057

Topics

History · 1 version

3 Dec 2014Reading

Connections

Cited by 16: Danske Fragtmænd A/S v European Commission (T-334/22); Republic of Austria v European Commission (T-101/18)2 provisions; Interessengemeinschaft der Hoteliers und Gastronomen Region 10 eV (Ighoga Region 10) and Others v European Commission (T-582/20); Deutsche Lufthansa AG v European Commission (T-218/18); ITD, Brancheorganisation for den danske vejgodstransport A/S and Danske Fragtmænd A/S v European Commission (T-561/18); Achema AB and Lifosa AB v European Commission (T-300/19); První novinová společnost a.s., venant aux droits de Mediaservis s. r. o. v European Commission (T-316/18); Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises v European Commission (T-255/17); Société Air France v European Commission (T-894/16); a&o hostel and hotel Berlin GmbH, successor in law to A & O Hotel and Hostel Friedrichshain GmbH v European Commission (T-578/17); Scor SE v European Commission (T-135/17); Deutsche Lufthansa AG v European Commission (T-492/15); Inpost Paczkomaty sp. z o.o. and Inpost S.A. v European Commission (T-282/16, T-283/16)2 provisions; Fútbol Club Barcelona v European Commission (T-865/16); Republic of Austria v European Commission (T-356/15); Whirlpool Europe BV v European Commission (T-118/13)
Cites 14: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)12 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2003/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 98/30/EC; Federutility and Others v Autorità per l'energia elettrica e il gas (C-265/08); Ålands vindkraft AB v Energimyndigheten (C-573/12); Deutsche Post AG and DHL International v Commission of the European Communities (T-388/03); The Queen v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and Secretary of State for Health, ex parte: Fedesa and others (C-331/88); Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty; EDP - Energias de Portugal, SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-87/05); Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (Text with EEA relevance); Plaumann & Co. v Commission of the European Economic Community (25/62); European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands (C-279/08 P); Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-525/04 P); European Commission v Ireland and Others (C-272/12 P)