Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Safa Nicu Sepahan Co. v Council of the European Union (T-384/11)
Judgment
Law
3.The claim for damages
45

Safa Nicu Sepahan Co. v Council of the European Union (T-384/11)

Judgment of 25 Nov 2014law://eu/cjeu/2011/t-384-11/para_45@2026-11-10

45The applicant asserts that the adoption of the restrictive measures against it has caused it both non-material and material damage, in respect of which it claims compensation.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · First Chamber
Case: T-384/11 · ECLI:EU:T:2014:986
Decided: 25 Nov 2014
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Safa Nicu Sepahan Co
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: I. Pelikánová
Bench: 3 judges
H. Kanninen, I. Pelikánová, E. Buttigieg
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011TJ0384

Topics

Common foreign and security policy

History · 1 version

25 Nov 2014Reading

Connections

Cited by 13: Patriotes.eu, anciennement Identité et Démocratie Parti (ID Parti) v Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations (T-1189/23); Maya Tokareva v Council of the European Union (T-269/24); Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko v Council of the European Union (T-470/21); Helsingin kaupunki v European Commission (T-597/19); Amer Foz v Council of the European Union (T-296/20); Aman Dimashq JSC v Council of the European Union (T-259/19); Samer Foz v Council of the European Union (T-258/19); Bashar Assi v Council of the European Union (T-256/19); Liam Jenkinson v Council of the European Union and Others (T-602/15 R); Naser Bateni v Council of the European Union (T-455/17)4 provisions; Bank Refah Kargaran v Council of the European Union (C-134/19 P)2 provisions; Fereydoun Mahmoudian v Council of the European Union (T-406/15)9 provisions; Fulmen v Council of the European Union (T-405/15)
Cites 25: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Council of the European Union v Fulmen and Fereydoun Mahmoudian (C-280/12 P); Bank Melli Iran v Council of the European Union (T-390/08); Abdulbasit Abdulrahim v Council of the European Union and European Commission (C-239/12 P); Jose Maria Sison v Council of the European Union (T-341/07); People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v Council of the European Union (T-256/07); Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010; Fabbrica italiana accumulatori motocarri Montecchio SpA (FIAMM) and Fabbrica italiana accumulatori motocarri Montecchio Technologies LLC, Giorgio Fedon & Figli SpA and Fedon America, Inc. v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (C-120/06); Organisation des Modjahedines du peuple d'Iran v Council of the European Union (T-228/02); Galileo International Technology LLC and Others v European Commission (T-279/03); J. M. Mulder and others and Otto Heinemann v Council of the European Communities and Commission of the European Communities (C-104/89, C-37/90); T. Port GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (C-122/01 P); Schneider Electric SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-351/03); Société Roquette frères v Commission of the European Communities (26/74); Birra Wührer SpA and others v Council and Commission of the European Communities (256/80, 257/80, 265/80, 267/80, 5/81); Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007; People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v Council of the European Union (T-284/08); Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 503/2011 of 23 May 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran; P. Dumortier frères SA and others v Council of the European Communities (C-64/76, C-113/76, C-167/78, C-239/78, C-27/79, C-28/79, C-45/79); Confederazione Nazionale Coltivatori Diretti (Coldiretti) and 110 farmers v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (T-149/96); Elena Candiotte v Council of the European Union (T-108/94); Casper Koelman v Commission of the European Communities (T-575/93); De Franceschi SpA Monfalcone v Council and Commission of the European Communities (51/81); Agraz, SA and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-285/03)