61It is also settled case‑law that the statement of reasons required by Article 296 TFEU must be appropriate to the measure at issue and must disclose in a clear and unequivocal fashion the reasoning followed by the institution which adopted the measure in such a way as to enable the persons concerned to ascertain the reasons for the measure and to enable the court having jurisdiction to exercise its power of review (see, inter alia, Case C-367/95 PCommission v Sytraval and Brink’s France [1998] ECR I-1719, paragraph 63; Case C-413/06 PBertelsmann and Sony Corporation of America v Impala [2008] ECR I-4951, paragraph 166; and Joined Cases C‑539/10 P and C‑550/10 PAl-Aqsa v Council [2012] ECR, paragraph 138).