Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Bruno Gollnisch v European Parliament (T-346/11, T-347/11)
Judgment
Law
The action for annulment in Case T-346…
Sixth plea, alleging breach of the int…
–The holding of a debate in plenary se…
177

Bruno Gollnisch v European Parliament (T-346/11, T-347/11)

law://eu/cjeu/2011/t-346-11/para_177@2026-11-13

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

History · 1 version

17 Jan 2013Reading

177It follows that, in accordance with those principles, a decision cannot be adopted on the basis of elements of fact and circumstances on which the person concerned was unable to put forward his point of view before the decision was adopted.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · First Chamber
Cases: T-346/11, T-347/11 · ECLI:EU:T:2013:23
Decided: 17 Jan 2013
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Bruno Gollnisch
Defendant: European Parliament
Rapporteur: S. Frimodt Nielsen
Bench: 3 judges
J. Azizi, S. Frimodt Nielsen, M. Kancheva
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011TJ0346

Topics

Privileges and immunities

Judgment of 17 Jan 2013

Connections

Cited by 22: Nicolaus Fest v European Parliament (T-305/23); Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Antoni Comín i Oliveres v European Parliament (T-115/20); Carles Puigdemont i Casamajó and Others v European Parliament (T-272/21); Robert Roos and Others v European Parliament (T-710/21); Jean-François Jalkh v European Parliament (T-230/21); IZ v European Parliament (T-155/20); IY v European Parliament (T-154/20); JA v European Parliament (T-156/20); Adraces - Associação para o Desenvolvimento da Raia Centro-Sul v European Commission (T-714/18); European Commission v RQ (C-831/18 P)2 provisions; Dominique Bilde v European Parliament (T-248/19); Steeve Briois v European Parliament (T-214/18); Marion Le Pen v European Parliament (T-161/17); Mylène Troszczynski v European Parliament (T-550/17); RQ v European Commission (T-29/17)2 provisions; Jean-François Jalkh v European Parliament (T-26/17); Jean-François Jalkh v European Parliament (T-27/17); Marion Le Pen v European Parliament (T-86/17); Jean-Marie Le Pen v European Parliament (T-140/16); Bruno Costantini and Others v European Commission (T-44/14)2 provisions; François Musso v European Parliament (T-589/14); this act
Cites 23: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Criminal proceedings against Aldo Patriciello (C-163/10); Bank Melli Iran v Council of the European Union (T-390/08); Technische Universität München v Hauptzollamt München-Mitte (C-269/90); John Robert Purvis v European Parliament (T-439/09); Arnaldo Lucaccioni v European Commission (C-257/98 P); Jacques Wunenburger v European Commission (C-362/05 P); Eugénio Branco, Ldª v Commission of the European Communities (T-347/03); Société Arcelor Atlantique et Lorraine and Others v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Écologie et du Développement durable and Ministre de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie (C-127/07); A. Racke v Hauptzollamt Mainz (98/78); Cementbouw Handel & Industrie BV v Commission of the European Communities (T-282/02); European Commission v Republic of Estonia (C-505/09 P); Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities (C-301/96); Jean-Claude Martinez, Charles de Gaulle, Front national and Emma Bonino and Others v European Parliament (T-222/99, T-327/99, T-329/99); Embassy Limousines & Services v European Parliament (T-203/96); Di Lenardo Adriano Srl and Dilexport Srl v Ministero del Commercio con l'Estero (C-37/02, C-38/02); Portuguese Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-42/01); Alfonso Luigi Marra v Eduardo De Gregorio and Antonio Clemente (C-200/07); Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-51/10 P); Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities (C-110/03); Commission of the European Communities v Chambre syndicale nationale des entreprises de transport de fonds et valeurs (Sytraval) and Brink's France SARL (C-367/95 P)