Judgment_paragraph 155 · European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Others v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (T-299/11)

155Finally, concerning the alleged harm to the reputation and credibility of the applicants, suffice it to note that it is clear from the case-law that the possible annulment by the Court of the award decision is, in principle, sufficient to repair the damage caused by that harm to reputation (see, to that effect, order of 20 September 2005 in Deloitte Business Advisory v Commission, T‑195/05 R, ECR, EU:T:2005:330, paragraph 126), without there being any need to rule on whether the ranking, where it is not justified, of the first applicant’s bid in third position according to the cascade mechanism instead of first or second position constitutes such harm.

European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Others v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (T-299/11)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections