Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Deutsche Bahn AG and Others v European Commission (T-289/11, T-290/11, T-521/11)
Judgment
Law
The first plea in law, alleging infrin…
Substance
99

Deutsche Bahn AG and Others v European Commission (T-289/11, T-290/11, T-521/11)

Judgment of 6 Sept 2013law://eu/cjeu/2011/t-289-11/para_99@2026-11-12

99Finally, the second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU provides a basis for legal action for non-contractual liability of the European Union.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Fourth Chamber
Cases: T-289/11, T-290/11, T-521/11 · ECLI:EU:T:2013:404
Decided: 6 Sept 2013
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicants: Deutsche Bahn AG; DB Mobility Logistics AG and 5 more
DB Energie GmbH; DB Netz AG; DB Schenker Rail GmbH; DB Schenker Rail Deutschland AG; Deutsche Umschlaggesellschaft Schiene-Straße mbH (DUSS)
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: M. van der Woude
Bench: 3 judges
I. Pelikánová, K. Jürimäe, M. van der Woude
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011TJ0289

Topics

History · 1 version

6 Sept 2013Reading

Connections

Cited by 12: Casino, Guichard-Perrachon and Achats Marchandises Casino SAS (AMC), formerly EMC Distribution v European Commission (T-249/17)3 provisions; Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises v European Commission (T-255/17); Intermarché Casino Achats v European Commission (T-254/17); České dráhy a.s. v European Commission (T-621/16); České dráhy a.s. v European Commission (T-325/16); Alcogroup and Alcodis v European Commission (T-274/15); Holistic Innovation Institute, SLU v Research Executive Agency (REA) (T-706/14); Italian Republic v European Commission (T-358/11)2 provisions; Deutsche Bahn AG and Others v European Commission (C-583/13 P)6 provisions; Alstom Grid SAS v European Commission (T-521/09)2 provisions; Energetický a průmyslový holding a.s. and EP Investment Advisors s.r.o. v European Commission (T-272/12)2 provisions; this act
Cites 19: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)6 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Orkem v Commission of the European Communities (374/87); EEC Council: Regulation No 17: First Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty; Andreas Reinarz v European Commission (T-6/92, T-52/92); Deutsche Telekom AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-271/03); Omya AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-145/06); Pesquería Vasco-Montañesa SA (Pevasa) and Compañia Internacional de Pesca y Derivados SA (Inpesca) v Commission of the European Communities (C-199/94); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-224/03); France Télécom SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-339/04); The Queen v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and Secretary of State for Health, ex parte: Fedesa and others (C-331/88); Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV, Elf Atochem SA, BASF AG, Shell International Chemical Company Ltd, DSM NV, DSM Kunststoffen BV, Wacker-Chemie GmbH, Hoechst AG, Société artésienne de vinyle, Montedison SpA, Imperial Chemical Industries plc, Hüls AG and Enichem SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-305/94, T-306/94, T-307/94, T-313/94, T-314/94, T-315/94, T-316/94, T-318/94, T-325/94, T-328/94, T-329/94, T-335/94); Roquette Frères SA v Directeur général de la concurrence, de la consommation et de la répression des fraudes, and Commission of the European Communities (C-94/00); Groupement des cartes bancaires (CB) v Commission of the European Communities (T-266/03); AM & S Europe Limited v Commission of the European Communities (155/79); Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Akcros Chemicals Ltd v European Commission (C-550/07 P); Hoechst AG v Commission of the European Communities (46/87, 227/88); Dow Chemical Ibérica, SA, and others v Commission of the European Communities (97/87, 98/87, 99/87); Ventouris Group Enterprises SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-59/99)