Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Ahmed Abdelaziz Ezz and Others v Council of the European Union (T-256/11)
Judgment
Law
6.The sixth plea in law, alleging infr…
As regards the first set of arguments
197

Ahmed Abdelaziz Ezz and Others v Council of the European Union (T-256/11)

Judgment of 27 Feb 2014law://eu/cjeu/2011/t-256-11/para_197@2026-11-10

197Consequently, in order to comply with EU law, a limitation on the exercise of the right to property must, in any event, satisfy three conditions.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Third Chamber
Case: T-256/11 · ECLI:EU:T:2014:93
Decided: 27 Feb 2014
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicants: Ahmed Abdelaziz Ezz; Abla Mohammed Fawzi Ali Ahmed and 3 more
Khadiga Ahmed Ahmed Kamel Yassin; Shahinaz Abdel Azizabdel Wahab Al Naggar; represented initially by M. Lester, Barrister, and J. Binns, Solicitor, and subsequently by J. Binns, J. Lewis QC, B. Kennelly, Barrister, and I. Burton, Solicitor
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: D. Gratsias
Bench: 3 judges
O. Czúcz, I. Labucka, D. Gratsias
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011TJ0256

Topics

Common foreign and security policy

History · 1 version

27 Feb 2014Reading

Connections

Cited by 25: Iran Air - The Airline of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Iran Air) v Council of the European Union (T-676/24); Anastasia Ignatova v Council of the European Union (T-601/24); Aleksandra Melnichenko v Council of the European Union (T-1113/23); UC v Council of the European Union (T-72/24); Positive Group PAO v Council of the European Union (T-573/23); Ghada Mhana v Council of the European Union (T-386/24); Kinda Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (T-388/24); Sara Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (T-387/24); German Khan v Council of the European Union (T-289/23); Evgeny Borisovich Zubitskiy v Council of the European Union (T-1074/23); Vladimir Gheorghe Plahotniuc v Council of the European Union (T-480/23); Samer Kamal Al-Assad v Council of the European Union (T-370/23); Sara Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (T-206/22); Ghada Mhana v Council of the European Union (T-207/22); Kinda Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (T-208/22); State Development Corporation "VEB.RF" v Council of the European Union (T-288/22); Alexander Semenovich Vinokurov v Council of the European Union (T-302/22); Russian Direct Investment Fund v Council of the European Union (T-235/22); Igor Shuvalov v Council of the European Union (T-289/22); Vadim Nikolaevich Moshkovich v Council of the European Union (T-283/22); German Khan v Council of the European Union (T-333/22); Dmitry Arkadievich Mazepin v Council of the European Union (T-282/22); Nizar Assaad v Council of the European Union (T-426/21); Belaeronavigatsia v Council of the European Union (T-536/21); RT France v Council of the European Union (T-125/22)
Cites 8: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)7 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)7 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)6 provisions; Yassin Abdullah Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (C-402/05); DR and TV2 Danmark A/S v NCB – Nordisk Copyright Bureau (C-510/10); Bank Melli Iran v Council of the European Union (T-390/08); Council of the European Union v Nadiany Bamba (C-417/11 P); Knauf Gips KG v European Commission (C-407/08 P)