191In that regard, the Court finds at the outset that the third set of arguments, stated in paragraph 189 above must, in any event, be rejected. The importance of the aims pursued by Decision 2011/172 and Regulation No 270/2011 is such as to justify their possible - even substantial - negative consequences for the applicants without that affecting their lawfulness (see, to that effect, Case C-84/95 Bosphorus [1996] ECR I-3953, paragraph 26, and Case T‑390/08 Bank Melli Iran v Council, cited at paragraph 161 above, paragraph 70).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.