Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-658/11)
Judgment
The action
First plea in law, alleging infringeme…
Findings of the Court
53

European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-658/11)

Judgment of 24 Jun 2014law://eu/cjeu/2011/c-658-11/para_53@2026-11-10

53However, precisely because of its general nature, that procedure must take account of the specific features which the Treaties lay down in respect of each field of EU activity, particularly as regards the powers of the institutions.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-658/11 · ECLI:EU:C:2014:2025
Decided: 24 Jun 2014
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: Decision 2011/640
Applicant: European Parliament
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: A. Tizzano
Advocate General: Y. Bot
Bench: 15 judges
V. Skouris, K. Lenaerts, A. Tizzano, M. Ilešič, T. von Danwitz, M. Safjan, J. Malenovský, E. Levits, A. Ó Caoimh, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, D. Šváby, M. Berger, A. Prechal, E. Jarašiūnas
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011CJ0658

Topics

Common foreign and security policy

History · 1 version

24 Jun 2014Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Decision 2011/640/CFSP of 12 July 2011 on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius on the conditions of transfer of suspected pirates and associated seized property from the European Union-led naval force to the Republic of Mauritius and on the conditions of suspected pirates after transfer
Cited by 16: PJSC Rosneft Oil Company v Her Majesty's Treasury and Others (C-72/15); Neves 77 Solutions SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală Antifraudă Fiscală (C-351/22); Ursa Major Services BV v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (C-814/18); Alfa-Bank JSC v Council of the European Union (T-271/23); KS and Others v Council of the European Union and Others (C-29/22 P)2 provisions; European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-743/19); Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario) v Council of the European Union (T-279/19); European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden (C-389/19 P); Bank Refah Kargaran v Council of the European Union (C-134/19 P); Kingdom of Sweden v European Commission (T-837/16); European Commission v Council of the European Union (C-626/15, C-659/16)2 provisions; European Commission v Council of the European Union (C-244/17)3 provisions; European Commission v Council of the European Union (C-389/15); Tilly-Sabco SAS v European Commission (C-183/16 P); H v Council of the European Union and Others (C-455/14 P); European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-263/14)6 provisions
Cites 7: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)6 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)6 provisions; Council Decision 2011/640/CFSP of 12 July 2011 on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius on the conditions of transfer of suspected pirates and associated seized property from the European Union-led naval force to the Republic of Mauritius and on the conditions of suspected pirates after transfer; European Parliament v Council of the European Union (C-130/10); Rahmanian Koushkaki v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-84/12); SA Roquette Frères v Council of the European Communities (138/79); Dietmar Klarenberg v Ferrotron Technologies GmbH (C-466/07)