Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
French Republic v European Commission (C-601/11 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The second plea in law, alleging disto…
Findings of the Court
106

French Republic v European Commission (C-601/11 P)

Judgment of 11 Jul 2013law://eu/cjeu/2011/c-601-11/para_106@2026-11-11

106Second, the French Republic has not shown to the requisite legal standard that the General Court adopted an interpretation of those scientific opinions which is manifestly at odds with their content.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-601/11 P · ECLI:EU:C:2013:465
Decided: 11 Jul 2013
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: French Republic
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: U. Lõhmus
Advocate General: M. Wathelet
Bench: 5 judges
L. Bay Larsen, J. Malenovský, U. Lõhmus, M. Safjan, A. Prechal
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011CJ0601

Topics

History · 1 version

11 Jul 2013Reading

Connections

Cited by 6: Alcogroup and Alcodis v European Commission (C-403/18 P)2 provisions; European Commission v Alain Laurent Brouillard (C-728/17); Jean-Charles Marchiani v European Parliament (C-566/14 P); Kingdom of Denmark v European Commission (C-417/12 P); Nexans SA and Nexans France SAS v European Commission (C-37/13 P); European Commission v French Republic (C-520/11)
Cites 18: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies; Monsanto Agricoltura Italia SpA and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others (C-236/01); General Motors BV v Commission of the European Communities (C-551/03); Activision Blizzard Germany GmbH v European Commission (C-260/09 P); Agrarproduktion Staebelow GmbH v Landrat des Landkreises Bad Doberan (C-504/04); Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-544/09); Regulation (EC) No 1923/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (Text with EEA relevance); Commission Regulation (EC) No 727/2007 of 26 June 2007 amending Annexes I, III, VII and X to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (Text with EEA relevance); Commission Regulation (EC) No 746/2008 of 17 June 2008 amending Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (Text with EEA relevance); Bertelsmann AG and Sony Corporation of America v Independent Music Publishers and Labels Association (Impala) (C-413/06); Kingdom of Sweden v Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) and European Commission, Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) v European Commission and European Commission v Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) (C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P, C-532/07 P); Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety; Jose Maria Sison v Council of the European Union (C-266/05 P); Republic of Poland v European Commission (C-335/09 P); French Republic v European Commission (T-257/07); Archer Daniels Midland Co. and Archer Daniels Midland Ingredients Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-397/03); Mediaset SpA v European Commission (C-403/10)