Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Anssi Ketelä (C-592/11)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
The first and third questions
44

Anssi Ketelä (C-592/11)

Judgment of 25 Oct 2012law://eu/cjeu/2011/c-592-11/para_44@2026-11-11

44Such an exclusion might also infringe the principle of non-discrimination in Article 40(2) TFEU (see, to that effect, Tenuta il Bosco, paragraph 16).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Eighth Chamber
Case: C-592/11 · ECLI:EU:C:2012:673
Decided: 25 Oct 2012
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland)
Applicant: Anssi Ketelä
Rapporteur: A. Prechal
Advocate General: P. Cruz Villalón
Bench: 3 judges
L. Bay Larsen, C. Toader, A. Prechal
Language: Finnish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011CJ0592

Topics

History · 1 version

25 Oct 2012Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
Cited by 10: TMD Gesellschaft für transfusionsmedizinische Dienste mbH v Finanzamt Kassel II - Hofgeismar (C-412/15); Criminal proceedings against A. P (C-2/19); Кanevi Komers DS EOOD v Zamestnik izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond „Zemedelie“ (C-267/24); Società Agricola Circe di OL Società Semplice v ST and Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA) (C-625/23); Karl und Georg Anwander GbR Güterverwaltung v Land Baden-Württemberg (C-239/23)2 provisions; X v Agrárminiszter (C-6/23); C.J. v Région wallonne (C-830/19); József Lingurár v Miniszterelnökséget vezető miniszter (C-315/16); Občina Gorje v Republika Slovenija (C-111/15); Szatmári Malom Kft. v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal Központi Szerve (C-135/13)6 provisions
Cites 9: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD); Commission Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 of 15 December 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD); Danske Svineproducenter v Justitsministeriet (C-316/10); Tomasz Ziolkowski and Barbara Szeja and Others v Land Berlin (C-424/10, C-425/10); Société Azienda Avicola Sant'Anna v Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale (INPS) and Servizio Contributi Agricoli Unificati (SCAU) (85/77); Società Tenuta il Bosco Srl v Ministero delle finanze dello Stato (C-162/91); Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands (C-113/02); Friederike Wallentin-Hermann v Alitalia - Linee Aeree Italiane SpA (C-549/07)