Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Mariana Irimie v Administraţia Finanţelor Publice Sibiu and Administraţia Fondului pentru Mediu (C-565/11)
Judgment
Consideration of the question referred
22

Mariana Irimie v Administraţia Finanţelor Publice Sibiu and Administraţia Fondului pentru Mediu (C-565/11)

Judgment of 18 Apr 2013law://eu/cjeu/2011/c-565-11/para_22@2026-11-10

22Accordingly, the principle of the obligation of Member States to repay with interest amounts of tax levied in breach of European Union law follows from that law (Littlewoods Retail and Others, paragraph 26, and Zuckerfabrik Jülich and Others, paragraph 66).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-565/11 · ECLI:EU:C:2013:250
Decided: 18 Apr 2013
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Tribunalul Sibiu (Romania)
Applicant: Mariana Irimie
Defendants: Administraţia Finanţelor Publice Sibiu; Administraţia Fondului pentru Mediu
Rapporteur: M. Ilešič
Advocate General: M. Wathelet
Bench: 5 judges
M. Ilešič, E. Jarašiūnas, A. Ó Caoimh, C. Toader, C. G. Fernlund
Language: Romanian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011CJ0565

Topics

Fundamental rights Principles of Union law Taxation

History · 1 version

18 Apr 2013Reading

Connections

Cited by 12: Dragoș Constantin Târșia v Statul român and Serviciul Public Comunitar Regim Permise de Conducere si Inmatriculare a Autovehiculelor (C-69/14); Asociación de Consumidores Independientes de Castilla y León v Anuntis Segundamano España SL (C-413/12)2 provisions; Gemeente Dinkelland v Ontvanger van de Belastingdienst/Grote ondernemingen, kantoor Zwolle (C-674/22)2 provisions; Gräfendorfer Geflügel- und Tiefkühlfeinkost Produktions GmbH and Others v Hauptzollamt Hamburg and Hauptzollamt Kiel (C-415/20)2 provisions; Sole-Mizo Zrt. and Dalmandi Mezőgazdasági Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (C-13/18, C-126/18)2 provisions; Wortmann KG Internationale Schuhproduktionen v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld (C-365/15)2 provisions; Silvia Ciup v Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice (AJFP) Timiș - Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice (DGRFP) Timișoara (C-288/14); Vasile Budișan v Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Cluj (C-586/14)2 provisions; I. Schroeder KG (GmbH & Co.) v Council of the European Union and European Commission (T-205/14)2 provisions; Hüpeden & Co. (GmbH & Co.) KG v Council of the European Union and European Commission (T-206/14); Mihai Manea v Instituția Prefectului județul Brașov - Serviciul Public Comunitar Regim de Permise de Conducere și Inmatriculare a Vehiculelor (C-76/14)2 provisions; Ilie Nicolae Nicula v Administraţia Finanţelor Publice a Municipiului Sibiu and Administraţia Fondului pentru Mediu (C-331/13)
Cites 10: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Littlewoods Retail Ltd and Others v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs (C-591/10); Test Claimants in the Thin Cap Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue (C-524/04); Lady & Kid A/S and Others v Skatteministeriet (C-398/09); Ioan Tatu v Statul român prin Ministerul Finanţelor şi Economiei and Others (C-402/09); Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue (C-446/04); Zuckerfabrik Jülich AG and Others v Hauptzollamt Aachen and Others (C-113/10, C-147/10, C-234/10); Metallgesellschaft Ltd and Others, Hoechst AG and Hoechst (UK) Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and HM Attorney General (C-397/98, C-410/98); Mariana Irimie v Administraţia Finanţelor Publice Sibiu and Administraţia Fondului pentru Mediu (C-565/11)