Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Liga para a Protecção da Natureza (LPN) and Republic of Finland v European Commission (C-514/11 P, C-605/11 P)
Judgment
The appeals
The second ground of appeal, alleging…
Findings of the Court
79

Liga para a Protecção da Natureza (LPN) and Republic of Finland v European Commission (C-514/11 P, C-605/11 P)

Judgment of 14 Nov 2013law://eu/cjeu/2011/c-514-11/para_79@2026-11-10

79Article 6 of Regulation No 1367/2006 adds specific rules concerning requests for access to environmental information to Regulation No 1049/2001.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fifth Chamber
Cases: C-514/11 P, C-605/11 P · ECLI:EU:C:2013:738
Decided: 14 Nov 2013
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicants: Liga para a Protecção da Natureza (LPN); Republic of Finland
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: T. von Danwitz
Advocate General: M. Wathelet
Bench: 5 judges
T. von Danwitz, A. Rosas, E. Juhász, D. Šváby, C. Vajda
Language: Portuguese
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011CJ0514

Topics

Access to documents

History · 1 version

14 Nov 2013Reading

Connections

Cited by 21: Sumitomo Chemical Agro Europe SAS v Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail (ANSES) and Compagnie européenne de réalisations antiparasitaires SAS France (CERA) (C-809/23)2 provisions; Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. v European Commission (T-185/24); European Commission v Covington & Burling and Bart Van Vooren (C-540/23 P)2 provisions; SD v European Medicines Agency (T-623/22); Martijn Frederik Nouwen v Council of the European Union (T-255/24); Milan Zver v European Commission (T-235/24); ABLV Bank AS v European Central Bank (T-100/23); Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission (T-104/23); Sara Soares v European Commission (T-606/23); ClientEarth AISBL v European Commission (C-249/23); Fabien Courtois and Others v European Commission (T-761/21); Margrete Auken and Others v European Commission (T-689/21); Roberto Acampora and Others v European Commission (T-261/23); Patrick Breyer v European Research Executive Agency (REA) (C-135/22 P); Troy Chemical Company BV v European Commission (T-662/21); Ondřej Múka v European Commission (T-214/21); Patrick Breyer v European Research Executive Agency (T-158/19); JP v European Commission (T-247/20); AlzChem Group AG v European Commission (T-569/19)3 provisions; Andrea Homoki v European Commission (T-517/19); Liam Campbell v European Commission (T-701/18)
Cites 21: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents; Stichting Al-Aqsa v Council of the European Union and Kingdom of the Netherlands v Stichting Al-Aqsa (C-539/10 P, C-550/10 P); Edwin Co. Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (C-263/09 P); Carmine Salvatore Tralli v European Central Bank (C-301/02 P); Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community institutions and bodies; European Commission v Agrofert Holding a.s (C-477/10 P); European Commission v Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH (C-139/07 P); Kingdom of Sweden and Maurizio Turco v Council of the European Union (C-39/05); Kingdom of Sweden v Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) and European Commission, Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) v European Commission and European Commission v Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) (C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P, C-532/07 P); European Commission v Éditions Odile Jacob SAS (C-404/10 P); Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria (C-147/03); European Commission v Portuguese Republic (C-171/08); Liga para Protecção da Natureza (LPN) v European Commission (T-29/08); Freistaat Sachsen and Volkswagen AG and Volkswagen Sachsen GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-57/00 P, C-61/00 P); Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxemburg (C-33/04); Société nationale interprofessionnelle de la tomate and others v Commission of the European Communities (C-87/89); Star Fruit Company SA v Commission of the European Communities (C-247/87); European Commission v Portuguese Republic (C-154/09); European Commission v Roumanie (C-522/09); Ignacio Ruipérez Aguirre and ATC Petition v European Commission (C-111/11)