Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Yoshikazu Iida v Stadt Ulm (C-40/11)
Judgment
Consideration of the question referred
Interpretation of Articles 20 TFEU and…
68

Yoshikazu Iida v Stadt Ulm (C-40/11)

Judgment of 8 Nov 2012law://eu/cjeu/2011/c-40-11/para_68@2026-11-11

68As stated in paragraph 63 above, the purpose and justification of those derived rights are based on the fact that a refusal to allow them would be such as to interfere with the Union citizen’s freedom of movement by discouraging him from exercising his rights of entry into and residence in the host Member State.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-40/11 · ECLI:EU:C:2012:691
Decided: 8 Nov 2012
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg (Germany)
Applicant: Yoshikazu Iida
Defendant: Stadt Ulm
Rapporteur: R. Silva de Lapuerta
Advocate General: V. Trstenjak
Bench: 5 judges
R. Silva de Lapuerta, K. Lenaerts, E. Juhász, T. von Danwitz, D. Šváby
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011CJ0040

Topics

Charter of Fundamental Rights Immigration policy Right of entry and residence

History · 1 version

8 Nov 2012Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (Text with EEA relevance)
Cited by 19: E.K. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-624/20); Cruciano Siragusa v Regione Sicilia — Soprintendenza Beni Culturali e Ambientali di Palermo (C-206/13)2 provisions; Toufik Lounes v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-165/16)2 provisions; V v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (C-147/24); YV and Others v European Commission (T-533/16); X v État belge (C-930/19); TB v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal (C-519/18); Nalini Chenchooliah v Minister for Justice and Equality (C-94/18); Anodiki Services EPE v G.N.A. O Evangelismos – Ofthalmiatreio Athinon – Polykliniki and Geniko Ogkologiko Nosokomeio Kifisias – (GONK) 'Oi Agioi Anargyroi' (C-260/17); Ibrahima Diallo v État belge (C-246/17); Alfredo Rendón Marín v Administración del Estado (C-165/14); Secretary of State for the Home Department v CS (C-304/14); Kuldip Singh and Others v Minister for Justice and Equality (C-218/14); The Queen, on the application of Sean Ambrose McCarthy and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-202/13); Ewaen Fred Ogieriakhi v Minister for Justice and Equality and Others (C-244/13); Víctor Manuel Julian Hernández and Others v Reino de España (Subdelegación del Gobierno de España en Alicante) and Others (C-198/13)2 provisions; O. v Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel and Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel v B (C-456/12)2 provisions; S. v Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel and Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel v G (C-457/12)2 provisions; Adzo Domenyo Alokpa and Others v Ministre du Travail, de l’Emploi et de l’Immigration (C-86/12)2 provisions
Cites 17: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (Text with EEA relevance); Erich Stauder v City of Ulm - Sozialamt (29/69); Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents; Kunqian Catherine Zhu and Man Lavette Chen v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-200/02); Minister voor Vreemdelingenzaken en Integratie v R. N. G. Eind (C-291/05); Werner Mangold v Rüdiger Helm (C-144/04); Tomasz Ziolkowski and Barbara Szeja and Others v Land Berlin (C-424/10, C-425/10); Murat Dereci and Others v Bundesministerium für Inneres (C-256/11); Aissatou Diatta v Land Berlin (267/83); Blaise Baheten Metock and Others v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (C-127/08); Friedrich Kremzow v Republik Österreich (C-299/95); Daniele Annibaldi v Sindaco del Comune di Guidonia and Presidente Regione Lazio (C-309/96); Council Directive 2003/38/EC of 13 May 2003 amending Directive 78/660/EEC on the annual accounts of certain types of companies as regards amounts expressed in euro; Shirley McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-434/09)