Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Allianz Hungária Biztosító Zrt. and Others v Gazdasági Versenyhivatal (C-32/11)
Judgment
Consideration of the question submitte…
42

Allianz Hungária Biztosító Zrt. and Others v Gazdasági Versenyhivatal (C-32/11)

Judgment of 14 Mar 2013law://eu/cjeu/2011/c-32-11/para_42@2026-11-10

42Moreover, it is necessary to take account of the fact that such an agreement is likely to affect not only one, but two markets, in this case those of car insurance and car repair services, and that its object must be determined with respect to the two markets concerned.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-32/11 · ECLI:EU:C:2013:160
Decided: 14 Mar 2013
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Magyar Köztársaság Legfelsőbb Bírósága (Hungary)
Applicants: Allianz Hungária Biztosító Zrt; Generali-Providencia Biztosító Zrt and 3 more
Gépjármű Márkakereskedők Országos Szövetsége; Magyar Peugeot Márkakereskedők Biztosítási Alkusz Kft; Paragon-Alkusz Zrt.
Defendant: Gazdasági Versenyhivatal
Rapporteur: M. Ilešič
Advocate General: P. Cruz Villalón
Bench: 5 judges
A. Tizzano, M. Ilešič, A. Borg Barthet, M. Safjan, M. Berger
Language: Hungarian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011CJ0032

Topics

History · 1 version

14 Mar 2013Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)
Cited by 23: Servier SAS and Others v European Commission (C-201/19 P); European Commission v Servier SAS and Others (C-176/19 P); European Commission v KRKA, tovarna zdravil, d.d (C-151/19); Lupin Ltd v European Commission (C-144/19); Teva UK Ltd and Others v European Commission (C-198/19); Mylan Laboratories Ltd and Mylan, Inc. v European Commission (C-197/19); Unichem Laboratories Ltd v European Commission (C-166/19); Niche Generics Ltd v European Commission (C-164/19); Crédit agricole SA and Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v European Commission (T-113/17); Valve Corporation v European Commission (T-172/21); Super Bock Bebidas SA and Others v Autoridade da Concorrência (C-211/22); Banca A v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) and Preşedintele ANAF (C-827/21); Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd v European Commission (T-350/17); Scania AB and Others v European Commission (T-799/17); SIA „Visma Enterprise” v Konkurences padome (C-306/20)2 provisions; Gazdasági Versenyhivatal v Budapest Bank Nyrt. and Others (C-228/18); Teritorialna direktsia Severna morska, successor in law to Mitnitsa Varna v „Schenker“ EOOD (C-655/18); HSBC Holdings plc and Others v European Commission (T-105/17); Pometon SpA v European Commission (T-433/16); Servier SAS and Others v European Commission (T-691/14)2 provisions; Unichem Laboratories Ltd v European Commission (T-705/14); Mylan Laboratories Ltd and Mylan, Inc. v European Commission (T-682/14); Niche Generics Ltd v European Commission (T-701/14)
Cites 24: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Football Association Premier League Ltd and Others v QC Leisure and Others and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (C-403/08, C-429/08); Confederación Española de Empresarios de Estaciones de Servicio v Compañía Española de Petróleos SA (C-217/05); PreussenElektra AG v Schhleswag AG, in the presence of Windpark Reußenköge III GmbH and Land Schleswig-Holstein (C-379/98); Teresa Cicala v Regione Siciliana (C-482/10); Federico Cipolla v Rosaria Fazari, née Portolese and Stefano Macrino and Claudia Capoparte v Roberto Meloni (C-94/04, C-202/04); Massam Dzodzi v Belgian State (C-297/88); Competition Authority v Beef Industry Development Society Ltd and Barry Brothers (Carrigmore) Meats Ltd (C-209/07); GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited v Commission of the European Communities and Commission of the European Communities v GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited and European Association of Euro Pharmaceutical Companies (EAEPC) v Commission of the European Communities and Asociación de exportadores españoles de productos farmacéuticos (Aseprofar) v Commission of the European Communities (C-501/06); Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato v Ente tabacchi italiani - ETI SpA and Others and Philip Morris Products SA and Others v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato and Others (C-280/06); Expedia Inc. v Autorité de la concurrence and Others (C-226/11); T-Mobile Netherlands BV, KPN Mobile NV, Orange Nederland NV and Vodafone Libertel NV v Raad van bestuur van de Nederlandse Mededingingsautoriteit (C-8/08); Pelati d.o.o. v Republika Slovenija (C-603/10); Établissements Consten S.à.R.L. and Grundig-Verkaufs-GmbH v Commission of the European Economic Community (C-56/64); Société Technique Minière (L.T.M.) v Maschinenbau Ulm GmbH (M.B.U.) (C-56/65); A. Leur-Bloem v Inspecteur der Belastingdienst/Ondernemingen Amsterdam 2 (C-28/95); Miller International Schallplatten GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-19/77); Modehuis A. Zwijnenburg BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-352/08); Bericap Záródástechnikai Bt. v Plastinnova 2000 Kft (C-180/11); Pedro IV Servicios SL v Total España SA (C-260/07); SA Binon & Cie v SA Agence et messageries de la presse (C-243/83); Varzim Sol — Turismo, Jogo e Animação SA v Fazenda Pública (C-25/11); Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique SAS v Président de l’Autorité de la concurrence and Ministre de l’Économie, de l’Industrie et de l’Emploi (C-439/09); Kofisa Italia Srl v Ministero delle Finanze, Servizio della Riscossione dei Tributi - Concessione Provincia di Genova - San Paolo Riscossioni Genova SpA (C-1/99)