Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Sky Österreich GmbH v Österreichischer Rundfunk (C-283/11)
Judgment
Consideration of the question referred
Substance
Article 17 of the Charter
36

Sky Österreich GmbH v Österreichischer Rundfunk (C-283/11)

Judgment of 22 Jan 2013law://eu/cjeu/2011/c-283-11/para_36@2026-11-11

36However, in the light of the circumstances of the case in the main proceedings, the question arises as to whether the exclusive rights at issue constitute an established legal position within the meaning of paragraph 34 above.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-283/11 · ECLI:EU:C:2013:28
Decided: 22 Jan 2013
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Bundeskommunikationssenat (Austria)
Upheld as valid: Directive 2010/13
Applicant: Sky Österreich GmbH
Defendant: Österreichischer Rundfunk
Rapporteur: T. von Danwitz
Advocate General: Y. Bot
Bench: 13 judges
V. Skouris, K. Lenaerts, A. Tizzano, M. Ilešič, T. von Danwitz, J. Malenovský, A. Borg Barthet, U. Lõhmus, J.-C. Bonichot, C. Toader, J.-J. Kasel, M. Safjan, D. Šváby
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011CJ0283

Topics

Charter of Fundamental Rights Freedom of establishment Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

22 Jan 2013Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) (Codified version) (Text with EEA relevance)
Cited by 24: 'Trade Express-L' OOD and 'DEVNIA TSIMENT' AD v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia 'Darzhaven rezerv i voennovremenni zapasi' (C-395/22); INTERZERO Trajnostne rešitve za svet brez odpadkov d.o.o. and Others and Surovina, družba za predelavo odpadkov d.o.o. and Others (C-254/23); Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) v Council of the European Union (C-72/23 P); AEON NEPREMIČNINE d.o.o. and Others (C-674/23); European Commission v Hungary (C-769/22); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-458/22); Amazon EU Sàrl, venant aux droits de Amazon Services Europe Sàrl v European Commission (T-367/23); Banco Cooperativo Español, SA v Single Resolution Board (T-499/20); Ryanair DAC and Ryanair Sun S.A. v European Commission (T-398/21); Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) v Council of the European Union (C-44/23 P); Norddeutsche Landesbank – Girozentrale v Single Resolution Board (T-407/22); Norddeutsche Landesbank – Girozentrale v Single Resolution Board (T-412/21); Norddeutsche Landesbank – Girozentrale v Single Resolution Board (T-403/21); PH and Others v European Central Bank (T-323/22); Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board (T-360/21); Max Heinr. Sutor OHG v Single Resolution Board (T-393/21); Symphony Environmental Technologies plc and Symphony Environmental Ltd v European Parliament and Others (T-745/20); Athlet Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-650/22); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-737/20); Ryanair DAC v European Commission (T-769/20); Ryanair DAC and Condor Flugdienst GmbH v European Commission (T-34/21); Harley-Davidson Europe Ltd and Neovia Logistics Services International v European Commission (T-324/21)2 provisions; J.K. v TP S.A (C-356/21); PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank (T-330/19)
Cites 21: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Productores de Música de España (Promusicae) v Telefónica de España SAU (C-275/06); Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) (Codified version) (Text with EEA relevance); Emeka Nelson and Others v Deutsche Lufthansa AG and TUI Travel plc and Others v Civil Aviation Authority (C-581/10, C-629/10); F‑Tex SIA v Lietuvos‑Anglijos UAB ‘Jadecloud-Vilma’ (C-213/10); Afton Chemical Limited v Secretary of State for Transport (C-343/09); Criminal proceedings against Aldo Patriciello (C-163/10); Fabbrica italiana accumulatori motocarri Montecchio SpA (FIAMM) and Fabbrica italiana accumulatori motocarri Montecchio Technologies LLC, Giorgio Fedon & Figli SpA and Fedon America, Inc. v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (C-120/06); Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities; Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (C-437/04); United Pan-Europe Communications Belgium SA and Others v Belgian State (C-250/06); Paul Miles and Others v Écoles européennes (C-196/09); DEB Deutsche Energiehandels- und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-279/09); Kingdom of Spain and Republic of Finland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-184/02, C-223/02); Kabel Deutschland Vertrieb und Service GmbH & Co. KG v Niedersächsische Landesmedienanstalt für privaten Rundfunk (C-336/07); Directive 2007/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007 amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (Text with EEA relevance); Kommunikationsbehörde Austria (KommAustria) v Österreichischer Rundfunk (ORF) (C-195/06); Sky Österreich GmbH v Österreichischer Rundfunk (C-283/11); Deutsches Weintor eG v Land Rheinland-Pfalz (C-544/10)