Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Commission v Czech Republic (C-241/11)
Judgment
The lump sum
Findings of the Court
54

European Commission v Czech Republic (C-241/11)

Judgment of 25 Jun 2013law://eu/cjeu/2011/c-241-11/para_54@2026-11-11

54In particular, the complete transposition of Directive 2003/41 is intended principally to inform interested persons in the event that, as the Court observed in paragraph 51 of the judgment in Commission v Czech Republic, the national retirement pension system develops in that regard.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-241/11 · ECLI:EU:C:2013:423
Decided: 25 Jun 2013
Procedure: Infringement action
Applicant: European Commission
Defendant: Czech Republic
Rapporteur: A. Ó Caoimh
Advocate General: N. Jääskinen
Bench: 15 judges
V. Skouris, K. Lenaerts, R. Silva de Lapuerta, M. Ilešič, L. Bay Larsen, A. Rosas, G. Arestis, J. Malenovský, E. Jarašiūnas, E. Juhász, A. Borg Barthet, A. Ó Caoimh, C.G. Fernlund, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, C. Vajda
Language: Czech
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011CJ0241

Topics

Approximation of laws Freedom of establishment

History · 1 version

25 Jun 2013Reading

Connections

Cited by 10: Union fédérale des consommateurs - Que choisir (UFC - Que choisir) and Consommation, logement et cadre de vie (CLCV) v Premier ministre and Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance (C-407/21); European Commission v Republic of Poland (C-452/22)2 provisions; European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (C-692/20)2 provisions; European Commission v Slovak Republic (C-540/21); European Commission v Italian Republic (C-367/14); European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden (C-243/13); European Commission v French Republic (C-237/12); European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (C-184/11)2 provisions; European Commission v Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (C-576/11)2 provisions; European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (C-533/11)2 provisions
Cites 8: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (C-610/10); Directive 2003/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 June 2003 on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision; European Commission v Czech Republic (C-343/08); European Commission v Hellenic Republic (C-407/09); Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-121/07); Combinatie Spijker Infrabouw-De Jonge Konstruktie and Others v Provincie Drenthe (C-568/08); European Commission v Ireland (C-279/11)