Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Expedia Inc. v Autorité de la concurrence and Others (C-226/11)
Judgment
The question referred for a preliminar…
19

Expedia Inc. v Autorité de la concurrence and Others (C-226/11)

Judgment of 13 Dec 2012law://eu/cjeu/2011/c-226-11/para_19@2026-11-11

19Under Article 3(2) of Regulation No 1/2003, the application of national competition law may not lead to the prohibition of such agreements if they do not restrict competition within the meaning of Article 101(1) TFEU.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-226/11 · ECLI:EU:C:2012:795
Decided: 13 Dec 2012
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Cour de cassation (France)
Applicant: Expedia Inc.
Defendant: Autorité de la concurrence and Others
Rapporteur: U. Lõhmus
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 5 judges
A. Rosas, U. Lõhmus, A. Ó Caoimh, A. Arabadjiev, C.G. Fernlund
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011CJ0226

Topics

History · 1 version

13 Dec 2012Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance)
Cited by 21: Crown Holdings, Inc. and Crown Cork & Seal Deutschland Holdings GmbH v European Commission (T-587/22); Japan Airlines Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-340/17); Singapore Airlines Ltd and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd v European Commission (T-350/17); Air Canada v European Commission (T-326/17); Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v Nordzucker AG and Others (C-151/20)2 provisions; United Parcel Service, Inc. v European Commission (T-834/17); SIA „Visma Enterprise” v Konkurences padome (C-306/20); Generics (UK) Ltd and Others v Competition and Markets Authority (C-307/18); Teva UK Ltd and Others v European Commission (T-679/14); Dr. K. Chrysostomides & Co. LLC and Others v Council of the European Union and Others (T-680/13); Eleni Pavlikka Bourdouvali and Others v Council of the European Union and Others (T-786/14); ABB Ltd and ABB AB v European Commission (T-445/14); Prysmian SpA and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl v European Commission (T-475/14); Nexans France and Nexans v European Commission (T-449/14); Viscas Corp. v European Commission (T-422/14); H. Lundbeck A/S and Lundbeck Ltd v European Commission (T-472/13)2 provisions; Generics (UK) Ltd v European Commission (T-469/13); EGL, Inc. and Others v European Commission (T-251/12); UTi Worldwide, Inc. and Others v European Commission (T-264/12); DHL Express (Italy) Srl and DHL Global Forwarding (Italy) SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del mercato (C-428/14); Allianz Hungária Biztosító Zrt. and Others v Gazdasági Versenyhivatal (C-32/11)2 provisions
Cites 21: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Winner Wetten GmbH v Bürgermeisterin der Stadt Bergheim (C-409/06); Pfleiderer AG v Bundeskartellamt (C-360/09); GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited v Commission of the European Communities and Commission of the European Communities v GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited and European Association of Euro Pharmaceutical Companies (EAEPC) v Commission of the European Communities and Asociación de exportadores españoles de productos farmacéuticos (Aseprofar) v Commission of the European Communities (C-501/06); John Deere Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-7/95 P); Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej (C-410/09); T-Mobile Netherlands BV, KPN Mobile NV, Orange Nederland NV and Vodafone Libertel NV v Raad van bestuur van de Nederlandse Mededingingsautoriteit (C-8/08); Établissements Consten S.à.R.L. and Grundig-Verkaufs-GmbH v Commission of the European Economic Community (C-56/64, C-58/64); Javico International and Javico AG v Yves Saint Laurent Parfums SA (YSLP) (C-306/96); Toshiba Corporation and Others v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (C-17/10); Asnef-Equifax, Servicios de Información sobre Solvencia y Crédito, SL v Asociación de Usuarios de Servicios Bancarios (Ausbanc) (C-238/05); KME Germany AG, KME France SAS and KME Italy SpA v European Commission (C-389/10 P); Pedro IV Servicios SL v Total España SA (C-260/07); Carlo Bagnasco and Others v Banca Popolare di Novara soc. coop. arl. (BNP) and Cassa di Risparmio di Genova e Imperia SpA (Carige) (C-215/96, C-216/96); Franz Völk v S.P.R.L. Ets J. Vervaecke (5/69); KME Germany AG, KME France SAS and KME Italy SpA v European Commission (C-272/09 P); Société anonyme Cadillon v Firma Höss, Maschinenbau KG (1/71); Bayerische Motorenwerke AG v ALD Auto-Leasing D GmbH (C-70/93); Competition Authority v Beef Industry Development Society Ltd and Barry Brothers (Carrigmore) Meats Ltd (C-209/07); Develey Holding GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-238/06 P)