Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Leyla Ecem Demirkan v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-221/11)
Judgment
Question 1
60

Leyla Ecem Demirkan v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-221/11)

Judgment of 24 Sept 2013law://eu/cjeu/2011/c-221-11/para_60@2026-11-10

60Accordingly, there is nothing to indicate that the Contracting Parties to the Association Agreement and the Additional Protocol envisaged, when signing those documents, freedom of provision of services as including passive freedom of provision of services.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-221/11 · ECLI:EU:C:2013:583
Decided: 24 Sept 2013
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg (Germany)
Applicant: Leyla Ecem Demirkan
Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Rapporteur: A. Rosas
Advocate General: P. Cruz Villalón
Bench: 15 judges
V. Skouris, K. Lenaerts, A. Tizzano, L. Bay Larsen, T. von Danwitz, A. Rosas, M. Berger, E. Levits, A. Ó Caoimh, J.‑C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, C. Toader, J.‑J. Kasel, M. Safjan, D. Šváby
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011CJ0221

Topics

Association agreements Freedom of movement for workers International agreements

History · 1 version

24 Sept 2013Reading

Connections

Cited by 10: Agro Foreign Trade & Agency Ltd v Petersime NV (C-507/15); Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-558/23); Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (T-557/23); EN v Udlændingenævnet (C-375/23); Proceedings brought by CX (C-629/16); Leopoldine Gertraud Piringer (C-342/15); Caner Genc v Integrationsministeriet (C-561/14)4 provisions; United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Council of the European Union (C-81/13)2 provisions; Essent Energie Productie BV v Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid (C-91/13); Naime Dogan v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-138/13)
Cites 19: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)6 provisions; Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Beata Pokrzeptowicz-Meyer (C-162/00); Ian William Cowan v Trésor public (C-186/87); Graziana Luisi and Giuseppe Carbone v Ministero del Tesoro (C-286/82); The Queen v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Abdulnasir Savas (C-37/98); Mehmet Soysal and Ibrahim Savatli v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-228/06); The Queen v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Wieslaw Gloszczuk and Elzbieta Gloszczuk (C-63/99); Vitor Manuel Mendes Ferreira and Maria Clara Delgado Correia Ferreira v Companhia de Seguros Mundial Confiança SA (C-348/98); Metalsa Srl (C-312/91); Polydor Limited and RSO Records Inc. v Harlequin Records Shops Limited and Simons Records Limited (C-270/80); Christian Grimme v Deutsche Angestellten-Krankenkasse (C-351/08); Criminal proceedings against Horst Otto Bickel and Ulrich Franz (C-274/96); 64/732/EEC: Council Decision of 23 December 1963 on the conclusion of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey; Nural Ziebell v Land Baden-Württemberg (C-371/08); The Queen, Veli Tum and Mehmet Dari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (C-16/05); Alexander Hengartner and Rudolf Gasser v Landesregierung Vorarlberg (C-70/09); Peter d'Ambrumenil and Dispute Resolution Services Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise (C-307/01); Ismail Derin v Landkreis Darmstadt-Dieburg (C-325/05); Salah Oulane v Minister voor Vreemdelingenzaken en Integratie (C-215/03)