Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Leno Merken BV v Hagelkruis Beheer BV (C-149/11)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
39

Leno Merken BV v Hagelkruis Beheer BV (C-149/11)

Judgment of 19 Dec 2012law://eu/cjeu/2011/c-149-11/para_39@2026-11-11

39In the absence of further specification in Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009, account should be taken of the context of that provision, of the scheme laid down by the legislation in question and of the objectives which that legislation pursues.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-149/11 · ECLI:EU:C:2012:816
Decided: 19 Dec 2012
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Gerechtshof ’s-Gravenhage (Netherlands)
Applicant: Leno Merken BV
Defendant: Hagelkruis Beheer BV
Rapporteur: U. Lõhmus
Advocate General: E. Sharpston
Bench: 5 judges
A. Rosas, U. Lõhmus, A. Ó Caoimh, A. Arabadjiev, C.G. Fernlund
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011CJ0149

Topics

History · 1 version

19 Dec 2012Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (codified version) (Text with EEA relevance)
Cited by 25: Pharma Green Holding SpA SB v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-480/25); Laboratorios ACPG, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-52/25); Heinz Thomas Altendorfer v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-297/25); European Union Intellectual Property Office v Nowhere Co. Ltd (C-337/22 P); Frutaria Innovation SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-381/24); Impossible Foods Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-67/24); OMV AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-38/24); RTL Group Markenverwaltungs GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-1089/23); RTL Group Markenverwaltungs GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-1088/23); Lotus Bakeries v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-1096/23); Lucien Haddad v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-538/23); Fractal Analytics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-194/23); Fractal Analytics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-211/23); Georgi Kirov v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-149/23); Supermac's (Holdings) Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-58/23); Daimler Truck AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-436/23); Sta Grupa AS v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-207/23); Coinbase, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-126/22); Azalee Cosmetics v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-765/22); IU Internationale Hochschule GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-188/23); Hofmeir Magnetics Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-452/22); Worldwide Brands, Inc. Zweigniederlassung Deutschland v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-552/21); Hacker-Pschorr Bräu GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-349/22); Scania CV AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-320/22); Zeta Farmaceutici SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-515/21)
Cites 14: Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (codified version) (Text with EEA relevance); Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (Codified version) (Text with EEA relevance); Ansul BV v Ajax Brandbeveiliging BV (C-40/01); La Mer Technology Inc. v Laboratoires Goemar SA (C-259/02); General Motors Corporation v Yplon SA (C-375/97); Libertel Groep BV v Benelux-Merkenbureau (C-104/01); PAGO International GmbH v Tirolmilch registrierte Genossenschaft mbH (C-301/07); Skov Æg v Bilka Lavprisvarehus A/S and Bilka Lavprisvarehus A/S v Jette Mikkelsen and Michael Due Nielsen (C-402/03); European Commission v Republic of Austria (C-10/10); Alfredo Nieto Nuño v Leonci Monlleó Franquet (C-328/06); The Queen v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, ex parte Gustaff Desiderius Antonissen (C-292/89); DHL Express France SAS v Chronopost SA (C-235/09); Elaine Farrell v Alan Whitty, Minister for the Environment, Ireland, Attorney General and Motor Insurers Bureau of Ireland (MIBI) (C-356/05); The Sunrider Corporation v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-416/04 P)