Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
IFAW Internationaler Tierschutz-Fonds gGmbH v European Commission (C-135/11 P)
Judgment
Background to the dispute
IFAW’s first request for access to the…
14

IFAW Internationaler Tierschutz-Fonds gGmbH v European Commission (C-135/11 P)

Judgment of 21 Jun 2012law://eu/cjeu/2011/c-135-11/para_14@2026-11-11

14By judgment of 30 November 2004 in Case T-168/02 IFAW Internationaler Tierschutz-Fonds v Commission [2004] ECR II-4135, the action was dismissed as unfounded.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-135/11 P · ECLI:EU:C:2012:376
Decided: 21 Jun 2012
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: 62008TJ0362
Applicant: IFAW Internationaler Tierschutz-Fonds gGmbH
Rapporteur: J. Malenovský
Advocate General: P. Cruz Villalón
Bench: 5 judges
K. Lenaerts, J. Malenovský, R. Silva de Lapuerta, E. Juhász, D. Šváby
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62011CJ0135

Topics

Access to documents

History · 1 version

21 Jun 2012Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: IFAW Internationaler Tierschutz-Fonds gGmbH v European Commission (T-362/08)
Cited by 15: Martijn Frederik Nouwen v Council of the European Union (T-255/24); Rems Kargins v European Commission (T-110/23); Hungary v European Commission (T-104/22); Veneziana Energia Risorse Idriche Territorio Ambiente Servizi SpA (Veritas) v European Commission (T-602/22); Asesores Comunitarios, SL v European Commission (T-77/22); Compañía de Tranvías de la Coruña, SA v European Commission (T-485/18); Republic of Malta v European Commission (T-653/16); Pagkyprios organismos ageladotrofon (POA) Dimosia Ltd v European Commission (T-74/16); French Republic v European Commission (T-344/15)7 provisions; Maria Concetta Cerafogli v European Central Bank (T-114/13 P)2 provisions; Unión de Almacenistas de Hierros de España v European Commission (T-623/13)2 provisions; Saint-Gobain Glass Deutschland GmbH v European Commission (T-476/12); Guido Strack v European Commission (C-127/13 P)2 provisions; Darius Nicolai Spirlea and Mihaela Spirlea v European Commission (T-669/11)2 provisions; Reagens SpA v European Commission (T-181/10)
Cites 7: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents; Kingdom of Sweden v Commission of the European Communities and Others (C-64/05 P); Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora; Jose Maria Sison v Council of the European Union (C-266/05 P); IFAW Internationaler Tierschutz-Fonds gGmbH v European Commission (T-362/08); IFAW Internationaler Tierschutz-Fonds gGmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-168/02)