Judgment_paragraph 41 · Fulmen and Mahmoudian v Council of the European Union (T-439/10, T-440/10)

41However, in proceedings before the courts of the European Union there is no remedy whereby the courts can adopt a position by means of a general declaration or statement of principle (Case T-33/01 Infront WM v Commission [2005] ECR II-5897, paragraph 171, and order of 3 September 2008 in Case T-477/07 Cofra v Commission, not published in the ECR, paragraph 21). Accordingly, the second head of claim and the fourth plea in law must be rejected, since the General Court manifestly lacks jurisdiction to hear them.

Fulmen and Mahmoudian v Council of the European Union (T-439/10, T-440/10)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections