Couture Tech Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-232/10)

Judgment of 20 Sept 2011

law://eu/cjeu/2010/t-232-10/para_22@2026-11-13

22First, according to case-law, Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 must be interpreted as meaning that a mark must be refused registration if it is covered by one of the grounds for refusal laid down in Article 7(1) of that regulation in part of the European Union. Such a part may comprise a single Member State (see, to that effect, Case C-25/05 P Storck v OHIM [2006] ECR I-5719, paragraphs 81 and 83).

Couture Tech Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-232/10)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections