13 judgesV. Skouris, K. Lenaerts, A. Tizzano, M. Ilešič, T. von Danwitz, J. Malenovský, U. Lõhmus, E. Levits, A. Ó Caoimh, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, C. Toader, J.-J. Kasel
72It is also settled case-law that the restoration of the previous situation and the elimination of the distortion of competition resulting from the unlawfully paid aid may in principle be achieved through registration of the liability relating to the repayment of the aid in question in the schedule of liabilities (see, to that effect, Case 52/84Commission v Belgium [1986] ECR 89, paragraph 14; Case C-142/87Belgium v Commission, [1990] ECR I-959, ‘Tubemeuse’, paragraphs 60 to 62; Case C-277/00Germany v Commission [2004] ECR I-3925, paragraph 85; and Case C-331/09Commission v Poland [2011] ECR I-2933, paragraph 60).