Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (C-610/10)
Judgment
VII –Financial penalties
A –Penalty payment
2. Findings of the Court
b)The period over which the failure to…
103

European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (C-610/10)

law://eu/cjeu/2010/c-610-10/para_103@2026-11-13

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-610/10 · ECLI:EU:C:2012:781
Decided: 11 Dec 2012
Procedure: Infringement action
Applicant: European Commission
Defendant: Kingdom of Spain
Rapporteur: A. Arabadjiev
Advocate General: J. Mazák
Bench: 13 judges
V. Skouris, K. Lenaerts, A. Tizzano, M. Ilešič, T. von Danwitz, J. Malenovský, U. Lõhmus, E. Levits, A. Ó Caoimh, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Arabadjiev, C. Toader, J.-J. Kasel
Language: Spanish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62010CJ0610

Topics

Law governing the institutions State aid

History · 1 version

11 Dec 2012Reading

Judgment of 11 Dec 2012

103However, and contrary to the assertions made by the Kingdom of Spain, that fact is not in itself sufficient to mean that the obligation to comply with the judgment in Commission v Spain has been met.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Cited by 25: Lami Packaging (Kunshan) Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-104/25); Utiledulci – Comércio Internacional e Serviços, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda. – Zona Franca da Madeira v Autoridade Tributária e Assuntos Fiscais da Região Autónoma da Madeira (C-545/24); Emmanouil Peponis v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-494/24); Super Brand Licencing (SBG) v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-303/25); Mostostal S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-663/24); SiLog GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-572/24); European Lotto and Betting ltd. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-375/24); Devin EAD v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-351/24); European Commission v Hellenic Republic (C-368/24); Siemens Healthineers AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-1175/23); Ffauf Italia SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-425/24); Sardo Piemontese Sementi Soc. coop. – Soc. agr. (SA.PI.SE.Coop.agr.) v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-410/24); Verband der Islamischen Kulturzentren eV v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-377/24); Glaxo Group Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-432/24); Spin Master Toys UK Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-1172/23); Spin Master Toys UK Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-1170/23); Spin Master Toys UK Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-1171/23); Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-128/24); Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-121/24); Spin Master Toys UK Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-1173/23); Ferrari SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-1104/23); Ferrari SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-1103/23); Coinbase, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-46/24); Fattorie Garofalo - Società Cooperativa Agricola v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-1036/23); CeramicSpeed Sport A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-352/24)
Cites 22: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-304/02); ArcelorMittal Luxembourg SA v European Commission and European Commission v ArcelorMittal Luxembourg SA and Others (C-201/09 P, C-216/09 P); Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities (C-142/87); Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (C-280/05); Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (C-387/97); ThyssenKrupp Nirosta GmbH v European Commission (C-352/09 P); European Commission v Republic of Poland (C-331/09); Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (C-70/06); European Commission v Italian Republic (C-496/09); Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities (C-277/00); European Commission v Italian Republic (C-334/08); Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (C-348/93); Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain (C-499/99); Toshiba Corporation and Others v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (C-17/10); Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-177/04); Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (C-369/07); Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (52/84); European Commission v Italian Republic (C-454/09); Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (C-87/02); 91/1/EEC: Commission Decision of 20 December 1989 concerning aids in Spain which the central and several autonomous governments have granted to Magefesa, producer of domestic articles of stainless steel, and small electric appliances (Only the Spanish text is authentic)