Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Tomra Systems ASA and Others v European Commission (C-549/10 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The third ground of appeal: procedural…
Findings of the Court
73

Tomra Systems ASA and Others v European Commission (C-549/10 P)

Judgment of 19 Apr 2012law://eu/cjeu/2010/c-549-10/para_73@2026-11-12

73Contrary to what is claimed by the appellants, the invoicing of ‘negative prices’, in other words prices below cost prices, to customers is not a prerequisite of a finding that a retroactive rebates scheme operated by a dominant undertaking is abusive.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-549/10 P · ECLI:EU:C:2012:221
Decided: 19 Apr 2012
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicants: Tomra Systems ASA; Tomra Europe AS and 5 more
Tomra Systems GmbH; Tomra Systems BV; Tomra Leergutsysteme GmbH; Tomra Systems AB; Tomra Butikksystemer AS
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: R. Silva de Lapuerta
Advocate General: J. Mazák
Bench: 5 judges
K. Lenaerts, R. Silva de Lapuerta, E. Juhász, G. Arestis, T. von Danwitz
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62010CJ0549

Topics

Dominant position

History · 1 version

19 Apr 2012Reading

Connections

Cited by 21: Mowi ASA v European Commission (C-10/18 P); Servizio Elettrico Nazionale SpA and Others v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato and Others (C-377/20); European Superleague Company, SL v Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) and Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) (C-333/21); Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. v European Commission (T-334/19); Unilever Italia Mkt. Operations Srl v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (C-680/20); Google LLC, formerly Google Inc. and Alphabet, Inc. v European Commission (T-612/17); Lietuvos geležinkeliai AB v European Commission (T-814/17); Generics (UK) Ltd and Others v Competition and Markets Authority (C-307/18); Slovak Telekom, a.s. v European Commission (T-851/14); Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission (T-827/14); Teva UK Ltd and Others v European Commission (T-679/14); Servier SAS and Others v European Commission (T-691/14); Unichem Laboratories Ltd v European Commission (T-705/14); Niche Generics Ltd v European Commission (T-701/14); Lupin Ltd v European Commission (T-680/14); Orange Polska SA v European Commission (C-123/16 P); Marine Harvest ASA v European Commission (T-704/14); Confédération européenne des associations d'horlogers-réparateurs (CEAHR) v European Commission (T-712/14); Intel Corp. v European Commission (C-413/14 P)5 provisions; European Commission v ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias (C-78/14 P); Post Danmark A/S v Konkurrencerådet (C-23/14)
Cites 16: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance); Moccia Irme SpA, Ferriera Lamifer SpA and Ferriera Acciaieria Casilina SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-280/99 P, C-281/99 P, C-282/99 P); Erste Group Bank AG, Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich AG, Bank Austria Creditanstalt AG and Österreichische Volksbanken AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-125/07); Moser Baer India Ltd v Council of the European Union (C-535/06); British Airways plc v Commission of the European Communities (C-95/04 P); JCB Service v Commission of the European Communities (C-167/04 P); Tomra Systems ASA and Others v European Commission (T-155/06); Ferriere Nord SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-219/95 P); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); European Commission v Augusto Brazzelli Lualdi (C-136/92 P); NV Nederlandsche Banden Industrie Michelin v Commission of the European Communities (322/81); Konkurrensverket v TeliaSonera Sverige AB (C-52/09); Hoffmann-La Roche & Co. AG v Commission of the European Communities (85/76); Der Grüne Punkt - Duales System Deutschland GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-385/07); SA Musique Diffusion française and others v Commission of the European Communities (100/80, 101/80, 102/80, 103/80)