Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Commission v Agrofert Holding a.s (C-477/10 P)
Judgment
Appeal
Findings of the Court
The refusal of access to the documents…
55

European Commission v Agrofert Holding a.s (C-477/10 P)

Judgment of 28 Jun 2012law://eu/cjeu/2010/c-477-10/para_55@2026-11-12

55In that respect, it must be noted that an institution of the European Union, when assessing a request for access to documents held by it, may take into account more than one of the grounds for refusal provided for in Article 4 of Regulation No 1049/2001.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-477/10 P · ECLI:EU:C:2012:394
Decided: 28 Jun 2012
Procedure: Appeal
Applicant: European Commission
Rapporteur: E. Juhász
Advocate General: P. Cruz Villalón
Bench: 5 judges
K. Lenaerts, E. Juhász, G. Arestis, T. von Danwitz, D. Šváby
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62010CJ0477

Topics

Access to documents Concentrations between undertakings

History · 1 version

28 Jun 2012Reading

Connections

Cited by 22: Edward William Batchelor v European Commission (T-433/24); European Commission v Covington & Burling and Bart Van Vooren (C-540/23 P)3 provisions; SD v European Medicines Agency (T-623/22); MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board (T-291/23); Martijn Frederik Nouwen v Council of the European Union (T-255/24); Milan Zver v European Commission (T-235/24); Fabien Courtois and Others v European Commission (T-761/21); Margrete Auken and Others v European Commission (T-689/21); Hans-Wilhelm Saure v European Commission (T-524/21); Ondřej Múka v European Commission (T-214/21); Hans-Wilhelm Saure v European Commission (T-448/21); Hans-Wilhelm Saure v European Commission (T-651/21); AlzChem Group AG v European Commission (T-569/19); TUIfly GmbH v European Commission (T-619/18); Andrea Homoki v European Commission (T-517/19); Arca Capital Bohemia a.s. v European Commission (T-440/17)2 provisions; Arca Capital Bohemia a.s. v European Commission (T-441/17); Falcon Technologies International LLC v European Commission (T-875/16); Daimler AG v European Commission (T-128/14); Amicus Therapeutics UK Ltd and Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. v European Medicines Agency (T-33/17); Rogesa Roheisengesellschaft Saar mbH v European Commission (T-643/13); Republic of Malta v European Commission (T-653/16)
Cites 9: Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016); Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents; European Commission v The Bavarian Lager Co. Ltd (C-28/08 P); Commission Regulation (EC) No 802/2004 of 7 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (Text with EEA relevance); Agrofert Holding a.s. v European Commission (T-111/07); European Commission v Technische Glaswerke Ilmenau GmbH (C-139/07 P); Kingdom of Sweden v Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) and European Commission, Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) v European Commission and European Commission v Association de la presse internationale ASBL (API) (C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P, C-532/07 P); Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance); Kingdom of Sweden v European Commission and MyTravel Group plc (C-506/08 P)