Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Asociación Nacional de Expendedores de Tabaco y Timbre (ANETT) v Administración del Estado (C-456/10)
Judgment
The question referred for a preliminar…
The existence of a restriction on the…
35

Asociación Nacional de Expendedores de Tabaco y Timbre (ANETT) v Administración del Estado (C-456/10)

law://eu/cjeu/2010/c-456-10/para_35@2026-11-13

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-456/10 · ECLI:EU:C:2012:241
Decided: 26 Apr 2012
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Tribunal Supremo (Spain)
Applicant: Asociación Nacional de Expendedores de Tabaco y Timbre (ANETT)
Defendant: Administración del Estado
Rapporteur: J. Malenovský
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 5 judges
K. Lenaerts, J. Malenovský, R. Silva de Lapuerta, G. Arestis, T. von Danwitz
Language: Spanish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62010CJ0456

Topics

Measures having equivalent effect

History · 1 version

26 Apr 2012Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions
Cited by 2: Scotch Whisky Association and Others v The Lord Advocate and The Advocate General for Scotland (C-333/14)2 provisions; Valev Visnapuu v Kihlakunnansyyttäjä (Helsinki) and Suomen valtio - Tullihallitus (C-198/14)
Cites 12: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Ker-Optika bt v ÀNTSZ Dél-dunántúli Regionális Intézete (C-108/09); Procureur du Roi v Benoît and Gustave Dassonville (8/74); Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (C-110/05); Nicolas Bressol and Others and Céline Chaverot and Others v Gouvernement de la Communauté française (C-73/08); Karl Robert Kranemann v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (C-109/04); Klas Rosengren and Others v Riksåklagaren (C-170/04); Agenzia Dogane Ufficio delle Dogane di Trieste v Pometon SpA (C-158/08); Schutzverband gegen unlauteren Wettbewerb v TK-Heimdienst Sass GmbH (C-254/98); Ludwig Leichtle v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (C-8/02); J. van der Weerd and Others, H. de Rooy sr. and H. de Rooy jr., Maatschap H. en J. van ’t Oever and Others and B. J. van Middendorp v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (C-222/05, C-223/05, C-224/05, C-225/05); Criminal proceedings against Harry Franzén (C-189/95)

Judgment of 26 Apr 2012

35Any other measure which hinders access of products originating in other Member States to the market of a Member State is also covered by that concept (Commission v Italy, paragraph 37, and Ker-Optika, paragraph 50).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.