Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Jana Pereničová and Vladislav Perenič v SOS financ spol. s r. o (C-453/10)
Judgment
Consideration of the questions referred
Question 2
46

Jana Pereničová and Vladislav Perenič v SOS financ spol. s r. o (C-453/10)

law://eu/cjeu/2010/c-453-10/para_46@2026-11-12

History · 1 version

15 Mar 2012Reading

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-453/10 · ECLI:EU:C:2012:144
Decided: 15 Mar 2012
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Okresný súd Prešov (Slovakia)
Applicants: Jana Pereničová; Vladislav Perenič
Defendant: SOS financ spol. s r. o.
Rapporteur: M. Safjan
Advocate General: V. Trstenjak
Bench: 5 judges
A. Tizzano, M. Safjan, A. Borg Barthet, E. Levits, J.-J. Kasel
Language: Slovak
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62010CJ0453

Topics

Approximation of laws Consumer protection

Judgment of 15 Mar 2012

46Consequently, a finding that a commercial practice is unfair has no direct effect on whether the contract is valid from the point of view of Article 6(1) of Directive 93/13.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Interprets 2: Council Directive 93/13/EEC3 provisions; Directive 2005/29/EC2 provisions
Cited by 22: VB and Others v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA and AV and Others v BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA and Procureur de la République (C-776/19, C-777/19, C-778/19, C-779/19, C-780/19, C-781/19, C-782/19); Kamil Dziubak and Justyna Dziubak v Raiffeisen Bank International AG, prowadzący działalność w Polsce w formie oddziału pod nazwą Raiffeisen Bank International AG Oddział w Polsce, anciennement Raiffeisen Bank Polska SA (C-260/18); I.W. and R.W. v Bank BPH S.A (C-19/20); Zsuzsanna Dunai v ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt (C-118/17); Árpád Kásler and Hajnalka Káslerné Rábai v OTP Jelzálogbank Zrt (C-26/13)2 provisions; Abanca Corporación Bancaria SA v Alberto García Salamanca Santos and Bankia SA v Alfonso Antonio Lau Mendoza and Verónica Yuliana Rodríguez Ramírez (C-70/17, C-179/17); E.K. and Others v D.B.P. and Others (C-80/21); Lombard Pénzügyi és Lízing Zrt. v PN (C-472/20); BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA v VE (C-609/19); Vicente v Delia (C-335/21); JZ v OTP Jelzálogbank Zrt. and Others (C-932/19); ZH and KN v AxFina Hungary Zrt (C-630/23); QE v Caisse régionale de Crédit mutuel de Loire-Atlantique et du Centre Ouest (C-600/21); Zsolt Sziber v ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt (C-483/16); Bankia SA v Juan Carlos Mari Merino and Others (C-109/17)2 provisions; Jorge Sales Sinués and Youssouf Drame Ba v Caixabank SA and Catalunya Caixa SA (Catalunya Banc S.A.) (C-381/14, C-385/14); Trento Sviluppo srl and Centrale Adriatica Soc. coop. arl v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (C-281/12)2 provisions; A v B and C (C-738/19); CHS Tour Services GmbH v Team4 Travel GmbH (C-435/11); Ultimo Portfolio Investment (Luxembourg) S.A. v KM (C-303/20); Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (C-337/23); R. A. and Others v „Luminor Bank AS“,agissant par intermédiaire de „Luminor Bank AS“ Lietuvos skyrius (C-645/22)
Cites 12: Council Directive 93/13/EEC2 provisions; Directive 2005/29/EC; Asturcom Telecomunicaciones SL v Cristina Rodríguez Nogueira (C-40/08); Caja de Ahorros y Monte de Piedad de Madrid v Asociación de Usuarios de Servicios Bancarios (Ausbanc) (C-484/08); Pannon GSM Zrt. v Erzsébet Sustikné Győrfi (C-243/08); Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs eV v Plus Warenhandelsgesellschaft mbH (C-304/08); Mediaprint Zeitungs- und Zeitschriftenverlag GmbH & Co. KG v "Österreich"-Zeitungsverlag GmbH (C-540/08); VB Pénzügyi Lízing Zrt. v Ferenc Schneider (C-137/08); Elisa María Mostaza Claro v Centro Móvil Milenium SL (C-168/05); Pohotovosť s.r.o. v Iveta Korčkovská (C-76/10); Jana Pereničová and Vladislav Perenič v SOS financ spol. s r. o (C-453/10); Freiburger Kommunalbauten GmbH Baugesellschaft & Co. KG v Ludger Hofstetter and Ulrike Hofstetter (C-237/02)